So as long as Irion “looked honest”, Malihi would have had to accept the Kenyan birth certificate.
Harlan, do you really expect anybody to take what you’re saying seriously?
Everything you’re saying reinforces my point: that Malihi decided this based on his own whims - that is “judge’s knowledge”.
Malihi couldn’t “an objective threshold determination of these witnesses’ testimony without adequate knowledge of
their qualifications” - and yet he claimed to make an objective threshold determination of OBAMA’S ELIGIBLITY without ANY knowledge of his qualifications.
Double standard. The fact that he obeyed legal evidentiary standards for Taitz’ WITNESSES (though he also discounted the written documents submitted, one of which was from the Passport Office, which is supposed to have some probative value...) shows he knows what the law is. The fact that he didn’t do the same for Obama shows that he knowingly violated legal evidentiary standards.
He didn’t use “judge’s knowledge” to decide Orly’s case. He did use it to decide Irion’s.
It’s not lawful, and it stinks to high heaven. You’ve refused to answer my questions but even what you’ve said shows Malihi’s corruption.
So what was Plaintiff’s exhibit 1 in Welden v Obama?
Transcript here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/79854233/Georgia-Welden-v-Obama-Certified-Transcript-1-26-12-Hearing-tfb
Perhaps we should end this conversation - we are simply talking past each other. Have a good evening.