Son of Log Lady !
Posted on 02/07/2012 6:05:43 AM PST by mbarker12474
See the UVA Facebook site:
https://www.facebook.com/UniversityofVirginia
and the YouTube link to Mann's lecture:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPWff2L25E0&feature=share
https://www.facebook.com/UniversityofVirginia
and the YouTube link to Mann's lecture:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPWff2L25E0&feature=share
He’s the Mann he’s been waiting for.
I felt some warming as he was speaking. . .from all the hot air emanating from his pie hole!
VIRGINIA BEACH
“Earth might be slightly warmer, and sea levels might be slightly higher, but the changes are natural and should not be blamed on fossil-fuel emissions, a panel of scientists and skeptics said at a public forum Tuesday.”
“Human influence on the climate is very, very small - barely detectable,” S. Fred Singer, a critic of global warming and professor emeritus at the University of Virginia, told an audience at the Meyera Oberndorf Central Library.”
“The biggest applause from the audience of about 35 people came when Singer suggested the Environmental Protection Agency be disbanded.”
More here: http://hamptonroads.com/2012/01/uva-professor-throws-cold-water-global-warming
Mann made global warming is the correct term IMHO and
UVA’s professor emeritus Singer doesn't buy it!
I appreciate the satire. I also think it's appropriate that WE define the terms. The computer models predict Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming - CAGW
Warming - means it's getting warmer
Global - means it's world wide
Anthropogenic - means it's caused by mankind burning fossil fuels
Catastrophic - means we MUST do something about it NOW
There seems to be general consensus that there was GLW (Global Luke-Warming) in the 70's, 80's and 90's. There never was and never has been CAGW, other than in the now discredited computer models. Therefore Mann ind his cohorts invented a political term to hide the fact that there hasn't even been any GLW for the last decade. The political term is: Climate Change. Mann pretends that the CAGW models also predict Climate Change. They don't.
The CAGW models are wrong, and there isn't even any GLW. Don't let Mann and his Warm(m)ongers define the terms.
He is now at Penn State.
It seems all the scum has not yet been swept from Happy Valley.
Michael continues to Mann-ipulate the climate data.
Come on now; Mike was investigated by the University itself (at the direction of the well known Wife Swapping Studies Scholar, Prez. Spanier) and found to be pure.
Penn State should close ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.