"Sweet Meteor of Death, at last I found you!"
Posted on 02/07/2012 4:48:27 AM PST by IbJensen
As I said back in December, I have no plans to endorse a candidate for President of the United States. I wrote, at the time, “I would prefer instead to tell you exactly what I think about each of the candidates, good or bad, and let the chips fall where they may.”
Since then, I have routinely been asked who I would endorse. Today, after a lot of reflection on this race, I can honestly say my position has not changed and I would honestly prefer Ace of Spades’ sweet meteor of death than any of the candidates left in the race. Only the sweet meteor of death seems capable of stopping both Mitt Romney and Barack Obama. I can take the easy way out and not endorse because while I recognize politics necessitates compromise, I would have to compromise my intellectual honesty too much to choose any of the remaining candidates. Tonight, on my radio show, I put my weight behind the sweet meteor of death. You can listen to my reasons why here.
The Republican Party is putting itself in the hands of the economy. With Mitt Romney as the nominee, we will be forced to hope for a deteriorating economy because, while I will vote for him and think he is vastly better than Barack Obama, the fact is he has made no case for himself against Barack Obama except that he can do a better job on the economy. And let’s be clear — no Republican should hope or appear to be hoping for a deteriorating economy. It’s just that with no other justification for his election other than electability based on the ability to fix the economy, if the economy fixes itself, suddenly there is no justification for Mitt Romney’s electability.
My sincere and honest hope is that both Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich stay in the race as long as possible to deny MItt Romney enough delegates to secure the Republican nomination. I do not think either Santorum or Gingrich have much of a better shot against Barack Obama, but I do think they are at least running on bigger ideas than Mitt Romney — ideas that still translate and survive an improving economy.
For months I have said I am for “Not Romney.” It is not because I think either Gingrich or Santorum have a better shot at winning than Romney, but because I still hold out hope for a broker convention to save us from ourselves.
I may be a Republican, and at one time an elected Republican, but I have always needed more than just a letter of the alphabet next to someone’s name to get me excited. Newt Gingrich excites because he picks fights with all the people I think need to be fought, including Mitt Romney. God bless him for that. But I am under no illusion that makes him capable of beating Barack Obama without a deteriorating economy.
Rick Santorum excites me because, while I think he is a big government and compassionate conservative, he is willing to defend traditional mores in this country in a way few are. HIs bold stand for faith and tradition is honest and refreshing, but it also makes for a massive liability in a general election when he has so little to show voters on other fronts.
As for Romney, he does not excite me and has largely run his campaign making sure conservatives know he can get the nomination without them. That’s all well and good, but he certainly should not expect me or other conservatives to do anything for him in the general election other than, hopefully it won’t just be me, showing up to vote for him. That’s about all I plan to do for the man.
I’ll support the Republican nominee for President. I’ll defend him from meritless attacks and I will oppose Barack Obama. Any one of our candidates is better than Barack Obama. But God help us if any one of them is the nominee.
Until we reach the magic number 1144, which is the number of delegates needed to secure the Republican nomination, I hold out hope that someone or some meteor saves us from ourselves.
Voting for Obozo would permit him to appoint a few more lesbians to the SCOTUS.
Anyone here that doesn’t miss Herman Cain???!!!
A divided slate of candidates and Republicans staying home rather than hold their noses and vote for a less-than-perfect candidate will only insure four more years of Obama - and the resulting inevitable destruction of America.
Bet the farm on it.
You are correct, sir!
You sir, are right on target with that comment.
"Sweet Meteor of Death, at last I found you!"
We got such a crappy field of mush, because Sarah Palin did not run.
America as she could have been, may have ended that dark day.
We got such a crappy field of mush, because Sarah Palin did not run.
America as she could have been, may have ended that dark day.
America desperately needs and deserves something better than these two front-running geeks!
I’d be happy with Rush Limbaugh, Neil Cavuto, Michelle Malkin, Jim DeMint, the beleaguered governor of Wisconsin (name escapes me now and I just sent him $50)) or anyone out of the Omaha phonebook.
Maybe everyone should just ‘write-in’ their own choice for President.
Wonder what would happen then?
I agree with the general statement, but violently disagree with your conclusion.
I would rather have a quick resolution (whatever it might be) to the national financial train wreck (Obama) than the slower drawn out Romney version.
A lower amount of total national debt is likely.
There IS no difference in the long run.
Bet the farm on it!
(If you still own one)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.