Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain
I however do not understand the need to own an assault rifle for private use, with ammunition that will penetrate body armor. I have met exactly zero criminals who have possessed and have been wearing body armor. That doesn't mean it doesn't happen, but I have to wonder why someone would purchase ammunition or a weapon for that purpose. Do you need an AR-15 with 30-round clips to defend your house? From what? Terrorists? If you live in the country, then you can maybe justify it. But in an urban environment, I say no.

This jack-ass is too stupid to be an LEO. If he can't read the US Constitution, I wonder if he could even write a parking ticket.

13 posted on 02/06/2012 6:34:52 AM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cobra64

I have a side, but related issue with LEOs, at any level.

If you are acting as and representing yourself as an agent of the government, with the inherent authority granted therein,

there is no reason for you to be allowed to remain anonymous,
excepting that you are attempting to avoid responsibility
for malfeasance should you commit such.


16 posted on 02/06/2012 6:45:10 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson