Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney's Cheap and Empty Win
The American Spectator ^ | February 1, 2012 | George Neumayr

Posted on 02/01/2012 4:32:22 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

Mitt Romney's plastic and philosophically vapid campaign secured an easy victory in Florida on Tuesday night. Sunshine state GOP voters swallowed his "electability" argument whole, according to the exit polls.

It appears that country club Republicans have succeeded again in duping the GOP electorate into crowning a "centrist" Republican. Never mind that "centrist" Republicans rarely win the center. They usually lose the center while sapping the spirit of the party's conservative base.

Out of Bob Dole's and John McCain's tattered Big Tent steps another "reformed" RINO, Mitt Romney, who will receive, should he win the nomination, a similar thumping from the Democrats.

But let's say that he is "electable," for the sake of argument. Who cares? The purpose of politics in a republic is not simply to win but to win on sound principles. A party that pursues victory by scrapping or sidelining its platform will have no truth left with which to govern once it does.

If "electability" is the goal, why don't the politically correct plutocrats of the GOP just call for a one-party state? That way they could win every time.

The "electability" argument is bankrupt on both philosophical and practical grounds. It destroys the party's soul and guarantees defeat.

Even though Romney paid for this Florida win on his debit card -- outspending Newt by millions -- he still couldn't nail down the rank-and-file vote. Seven out of ten self-described conservatives didn't vote for him. This foreshadows the boredom and disgust that will keep conservatives home in the fall.

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: backstabberromney; benedictromney; betrayerromney; brutusromney; flprimary; gopestablishment; gopprimary; santorum4romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-164 next last
To: freemarketsfreeminds

There was a pac established to allow it. That’s all that matters. No pac, no contributions.


141 posted on 02/01/2012 11:17:51 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
I never said you lied....and didn't ask you for any more info then you already provided....thanks for your effort, all though appreciated was not necessary.
142 posted on 02/01/2012 11:38:36 AM PST by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
If "electability" is the goal, why don't the politically correct plutocrats of the GOP just call for a one-party state? That way they could win every time.

What the !#!?* is he talking about?

143 posted on 02/01/2012 11:53:32 AM PST by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingextremist1776
It's sort of a fine line. When someone asks for verification, it infers that the information received wasn't accepted as trust worthy or factual.

I honestly don't take offense. But the "you expect me to do your legwork" is something I've seen here so many times.

I hope the information was useful.

144 posted on 02/01/2012 11:54:17 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

The polls indicate Gingrich would have virtually no chance of beating Obama. Period. So what if he gets conservatives more excited? He would lose women in a landslide and has sky high negatives according to all polls.


145 posted on 02/01/2012 11:56:53 AM PST by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lasereye

The mouth on Mitt alone, will make his election impossible....

_____________________________________________________

Former New Hampshire governor John Sununu, a senior Romney surrogate, tells National Review Online that Mitt Romney’s comment to CNN — “I’m not concerned about the very poor” — was unhelpful to the campaign. But he cautions critics to consider the context.

“It was not the best choice of words, but the idea behind it is being misrepresented by others,” says Sununu, a former White House chief of staff.

“There was a context to that, saying, in essence, that we have a safety net for them,” Sununu says. “He was saying that we do not need to change policies for them. Same goes for the super-rich, who are fine. It’s the middle class; they’re the ones we need to be aggressive in helping. They’re the ones who’ve taken the brunt of the bad Obama policies of the past three years.”

Sununu acknowledges, however, that Romney “knows that he needs to be more careful,” especially after his Florida win.

“It’s not what you want to have happened, but you at least hope that your friends out there will frame the proper context for you, so that people will understand what you’ve said,” Sununu says. “And anybody who wants to oppose him will try to feed it into their narrative.”

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/289880/not-best-choice-words-robert-costa


146 posted on 02/01/2012 12:01:05 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: lasereye
" The polls indicate Gingrich would have virtually no chance of beating Obama. Period. So what if he gets conservatives more excited? He would lose women in a landslide and has sky high negatives according to all polls. "

So we upgrade from a liberal muslim messiah who bows to his muslim masters in the middle east, to a liberal self deluded god with a silver spoon who bows to his mormon masters in Salt Lake City. If that puts a tingle up anyone's leg, I suggest it's time they change their magic underwear.

147 posted on 02/01/2012 12:09:21 PM PST by AnTiw1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Logic n' Reason

A paid for election is the very definition of “a cheap and empty win.”

If buying votes is the key, Obama wins, as he has the dregs of the treasury to hand out money from.


148 posted on 02/01/2012 1:00:06 PM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
Why should Sarah have run? It has become patiently obvious that the GOP stands for Good Old Progressives now. There is no way in hell she would have been allowed to run. Look what they did to Cain and Bachman!

Only a fool runs in a race they are not allowed to win.

149 posted on 02/01/2012 1:04:38 PM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel
Why should Sarah have run? It has become patiently obvious that the GOP stands for Good Old Progressives now. There is no way in hell she would have been allowed to run. Look what they did to Cain and Bachman! Only a fool runs in a race they are not allowed to win.

You mean the same scary cabal that ran McCain? The group of rino's who supported McPain? And 'allowed' Palin on from out of nowhere to be potentially the "insider" in 2016 had McCain not been an idiot? That group?

Vast right wing conspiracy was funny when Hillary said it. When we say it, it sounds insane.

150 posted on 02/01/2012 1:19:06 PM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
They wanted Jeb (with the more pleasing Bush personality) but he has to wait for his turn.

So true, and I imagine Jebbie will be the 2016 nominee, don't you? Our little voters never learn.

151 posted on 02/01/2012 1:50:24 PM PST by Theodore R. (I'll still vote for Santorum in the unlikely event he is still on the April 3 ballot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I’m surprised jackass Tyrell let this guy write..


152 posted on 02/01/2012 1:54:10 PM PST by wardaddy (I am a social conservative. My political party left me(again). They can go to hell in a bucket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
So you can write for the American Spectator and still not be part of the "establishment" -- even despise and have contempt for the "establishment"?

Interesting.

153 posted on 02/01/2012 2:11:53 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
It wasnt a big win RomneyBot

Don't call me a RomneyBot, that's just stupid, wrong, and pretty rude, too. I can't stand Romney, but I'm not going to run around crying like a baby because he won Florida. This article was pure sour grapes from a writer that I have usually enjoyed reading.

154 posted on 02/01/2012 2:28:21 PM PST by BfloGuy (The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette
Since you seem to love the idea that Romney had a “big win”...never mind the details of it...

I dislike Romney intensely and will vote for Ginrich, but I refuse to join Newt's pity party. He screwed up big time in Florida and no amount of blaming Romney or the voters in Florida will change that.

Gingrich better start getting back to his platform and leave his wounded ego backstage. If you’re clapping, WHAT are you clapping for?

I hope by now you understand I wasn't clapping. I was being realistic. Stop whining, it doesn't win elections.

155 posted on 02/01/2012 2:38:21 PM PST by BfloGuy (The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: x

You’ll like this one too.

http://spectator.org/archives/2012/01/31/newt-battles-mush-from-the-wim

And here is another.

http://spectator.org/blog/2012/01/27/elliott-abrams-caught-misleadi


156 posted on 02/01/2012 2:57:58 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Logic n' Reason
Well, while you are pausing and wondering, why don't you try some logic and reasoning. It will get you farther.
157 posted on 02/01/2012 6:46:17 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
American Spectator trying to stay in business.

Good piece.

158 posted on 02/01/2012 6:49:29 PM PST by Rome2000 (MYTH ROMNEY IS A MORMON MELCHIDEZEK HIGH PRIEST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer
Now we have to utterly defeat Romney, and go to a brokered convention.

Bad idea. A "brokered" convention will be controlled, run and used by the establishment to install someone of their choosing, regardles of the party rank and file. Someone possibly even worse than Romney. You'll be wishing you had Gingrich after you see what a brokered convention will bring.

159 posted on 02/01/2012 6:55:10 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: The Working Man

LOL

Let them try

I saw these degenerate sons of bitches and their creepy pulled back wives up close and personal on the day they voted to banish the FL delegation to crappy hotels (talk about petty) and cut the delegate count in half.

BLUE BLOODS AND COUNTRY CLUBBERS OUT!!!!


160 posted on 02/01/2012 6:58:15 PM PST by Rome2000 (MYTH ROMNEY IS A MORMON MELCHIDEZEK HIGH PRIEST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson