[Which statement was incorrect?]
OK, I’m going to try this again, his attacks against his competitors could have been be as right as right can be but the DEBATING TIME WAS OVER.
He chose to slam his Newt and romney when they couldn’t respond...AND HE KNEW IT.
It’s called politics and was a fair play for a closing statement. No comparison whatsoever to the scorched earth ‘slampaign’ Romney is waging. Newt wanted to keep it clean, but Romney insisted on going gutter.
It’s called politics and was a fair play for a closing statement. No comparison whatsoever to the scorched earth ‘slampaign’ Romney is waging. Newt wanted to keep it clean, but Romney insisted on going gutter.
You did not answer the question. The responses to those issues had already been hashed out during the debate, and in his close, Santorum was drawing the contrast making the case he believes he would be the strongest because those previous positions could not be brought back on him like he believes could be used against the other candidates. So in order for this to be a 'slam' or an 'ambush' it would have to be something either untrue or not previously discussed in the campaign - and this of course has been rehashed repeatedly over the course of the campaign.
This is a flimsy, nonsensical attack on Santorum's integrity. You should be embarrassed.