Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DM1

The problem is that the last two debates were not “debates” - the reason Newt shone in SC is that he was able to direct the discussion onto the issues. These were basically personal attacks on Gingrich launched by Romney (and Santorum) and supported by the moderators. Should he have been more prepared for that?

Yes, but at the same time, he got a lot of criticism for the the Super-PAC ads in response to Romney’s attack ads on him in Iowa and SC, and was being depicted in the press as “angry” and “explosive.” This seems to be far from the truth, but I think it was kind of a no-win situation.

That said, his addresses at campaign and civic events in Florida were excellent, and I think did a lot to overcome the debate problem.


61 posted on 01/31/2012 8:37:39 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: livius

I have heard that Newt has been pulling in the crowds at his events. there may be some sort of “silent majority” type of thing that isnt reflected in the polls and Newt may overperform. I guess we will just have to wait and see the results though i still maintain that whoever wins Florida will most likely be the nominee though even that statement has caveats. If Gingrich ekes out a win or comes in a close second than he will probably be the nominee. If Romney wins big (say around 10 points) then he will probably be the nominee.


72 posted on 01/31/2012 9:44:27 AM PST by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson