“So, as far as you’re concerned it’s Newt or Obama?”
For all practical purposes, I suppose.
Better to cut our losses and get an accepatble nominee in 2016 if Mitt is the nominee. We’ll be able to maximize our House and Senate majorities as the Party out of the White House. Good things will come of it; plus, we can then stall for four years.
It’ll work much better than Romney with a Democrat Senate and House in 2014. “Ah jeez, guys, it was Massachusettes for Pete’s sake.......er........I mean a Democrat Senate for Pete’s sake......what’d you expect?”
No thanks.
I’d rather have an option in 2016 than no option until 2020. I’ll be joining “Project 17” if Romney wins the nod.
I bet when you were a kid, when you lost you grabbed the ball and ran home with it. Cut our losses, if you get your way we will have a lot a losses to cut. I suggest you grow up and do the right thing. This is no time for immaturity.
Well, let me preface by saying that I’m not a conservative who sees other conservatives as the enemy, even when I disagree with them. But, I do think that another 4 years of Obama may mean it won’t matter what we want to run for President, there won’t be much left to salvage. And so, I see sitting home, regardless, as the worse option. I understand why you think as you do, I just think you’re wrong.