Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kelly and accuser exchanged messages before, after alleged rape
NEW YORK POST ^ | January 29, 2012 | BRAD HAMILTON

Posted on 01/29/2012 3:14:41 PM PST by Hunton Peck

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Valpal1

Oooooooh.

A previous Freeper had said that, but I thought he was being facetious. If that’s ture, I guess the boyfriend didn’t need to accidentally find any texts or emails.


21 posted on 01/29/2012 5:16:30 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck; Just mythoughts; Thank You Rush

Story identifies him as “a single former marine.”


22 posted on 01/29/2012 5:31:00 PM PST by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush

Yes. Still a Marine Reservist, apparently (not that I would presume to endorse the reference to any Marine as “former”, mind you), and one of the reporters embedded with the troops in 2003.


23 posted on 01/29/2012 5:37:06 PM PST by Hunton Peck (See my FR homepage for a list of businesses that support WI Gov. Scott Walker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Maybe you *think* when a lady says no she means maybe.

If you perpetuate these lies you are part of the problem.


24 posted on 01/29/2012 5:37:56 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey

Ah, thanks. I missed the “single”, or thought it meant as opposed to multiple, or something...


25 posted on 01/29/2012 5:41:10 PM PST by Hunton Peck (See my FR homepage for a list of businesses that support WI Gov. Scott Walker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
Maybe you *think* when a lady says no she means maybe.

Often it depends on how she says "no". Sometimes "no" means "not yet". Guys historically have had the burden of dealing with women's emotional chaos and making some sort of guess as to how an initiative would be received. If she pulls a weapon, that generally considered a definite "no", although some girls might consider it foreplay. I tried to stay away from those, way back when.

We don't generally get engraved invitations telling us to show up at her apartment at 8pm Friday with a box of condoms. Or maybe that's how it's done these days -- it's been many years since I was dealing with the dating game.

26 posted on 01/29/2012 5:50:03 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck

The old saying “Marry in haste, repent at leisure,” could also apply to careless fornication.


27 posted on 01/29/2012 6:01:36 PM PST by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

What I posted way above were the “old rules”.

The “new rules” end like this:

When a lady says, “yes”, she means “maybe...until the statute of limitations has run out.”


28 posted on 01/29/2012 6:03:13 PM PST by lightman (Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini--nevertheless, Vote Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck

Ha. I tripped on that too. A single guy instead of two or three.

Anyhow it sounds to me like Kelly is getting jobbed here big-time.


29 posted on 01/29/2012 6:28:29 PM PST by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: lightman
The new rules seem to be "yes means maybe, unless at some point in the future I decide I don't like the relationship, in which case all prior yes statements are retroactively reclassified as no, with the police being notified".

Have it happen enough times, and society will need to adopt a new rule about rape: "If she doesn't report it within an hour of the occurrence, consent will be assumed in the absence of very convincing physical evidence to the contrary".

30 posted on 01/29/2012 6:28:43 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck

Maybe it’s just me, but it really irks me that she can drag his reputation through the dirt for what may well turn out to be baseless charges (and it sure sounds like it) yet she is “nameless”.... yea that’s fair ...


31 posted on 01/29/2012 6:42:07 PM PST by Froggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David
If the facts of the case are adequately reflected in this article, I hope the New York prosecutor’s office throws the proverbial book at her for filing a false report...

I doubt that most prosecutors even bother to look for that "proverbial book" to throw. False accusation of rape is apparently considered to be a very low priority crime. Crystal Gail Mangum did not serve one minute in jail for falsely accusing the Duke lacrosse players, though she was obviously guilty.

In most of the false rape accusation cases that I have read about, charges against the man are dropped after he spends a fortune in legal fees and has his reputation permanently tarnished, while the false accuser receives a little reprimand from the judge and perhaps some court-ordered therapy.

On those apparently rare occasions when a false accuser is actually tried and convicted, the sentences I have read about are far shorter than those typically received by convicted rapists. DOJ data from 1992 shows the average sentence for rape to be almost ten years, with average time actually served at about 5 1/2 years. If my cursory Google searches can be relied upon, the average sentence for false accusation of rape is about a year, and community service seems to be regarded as an adequate substitute for jail time.

My impressions and numbers may be wrong, but as usual with politically incorrect subject matter, it is difficult to find good quality data.

32 posted on 01/29/2012 7:27:14 PM PST by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625; Senator Pardek
Guys historically have had the burden of dealing with women's emotional chaos

Us gals, historically, have had the burden of dealing with men's emotional advances. A friendly smile is interpreted as "she wants me" or "she really wants me" while it's just a smile or possibly a charitable gesture.

When a woman says no she means it. If you hang out with emotional basket cases - well what do you expect? I personally wouldn't hang out with a guy who doesn't understand the language.

33 posted on 01/29/2012 7:32:54 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck

When you know of similar scenarios that have been done to people you know personally, it's hard to fault the cynicism. But when you become threat oriented, habits are not easily broken when someone you should get to know better comes into your life.

34 posted on 01/29/2012 9:05:24 PM PST by AnTiw1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
Us gals, historically, have had the burden of dealing with men's emotional advances. A friendly smile is interpreted as "she wants me" or "she really wants me" while it's just a smile or possibly a charitable gesture. When a woman says no she means it.

More precisely, when YOU say no, you mean it. The reason why men tend to ask again later after being given one "no" is because a statistically-significant percentage of women change their minds and say "yes".

Perhaps initially she said "no" because she just was in a bad mood. Perhaps she said "no" because she's really more interested in some other guy at the moment. Most guys will try again at least once, after a bit of time.

Some women get annoyed when guys ask again after an initial "no". Perhaps more women may get unhappy if the norm shifts to "no means we're done, move on, and never, ever ask her again".

Then again, as I've said, I've been out of the dating scene for more years than I like admitting to.

35 posted on 01/30/2012 7:40:04 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (I'd agree with you, but then we would both be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

I think we are both lucky to be out of the dating scene. Texting on a date is bad enough but the worst is the baseball hat worn during dinner!

Maybe it’s not the worst that could happen on a date but it’s pretty bad. My grandmother would banish anyone who didn’t know enough to remove their hat indoors.


36 posted on 01/30/2012 8:26:32 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
Speaking from my own experience with my wife of 30 years, the first time I met her, she wasn't interested. She was involved with another guy at the time. We became friends, she split with the other guy, was roommates with another woman who I knew, and after a couple of years we started dating.

If I considered "no means no forever", then things never would have happened. People change their minds about what they decide they're looking for.

37 posted on 01/30/2012 8:47:25 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (I'd agree with you, but then we would both be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
Watched “Tyson” with Mike Tyson talking about women - and I came away with the distinct impression that he liked rape, liked to rape, and liked to talk about rape.

I think Kobe was a better analogy - it appears that - rough unhygienic sex or not - she was happy to be Kobe's new GF - until she figured out she wasn't - then it was rape.

38 posted on 01/30/2012 8:56:55 AM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
...worst is the baseball cap worn during dinner.

I used to have two standing rules for my daughters' boyfriends upon coming over to the house for dinner:

1) you may not call either my wife or me by our first names. We are Mrs. and Mr. _____.

2) If you do not remove your baseball cap before coming to the table, you are out of the game...and once out of the game your cannot return.

39 posted on 01/30/2012 9:09:06 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

LOL. I agree. No means no at that time. Next week, next month might be a different story.


40 posted on 01/30/2012 6:04:48 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson