Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Josh Painter

“Happy with that outcome, are ya?”

Not in the least. But why are you limiting your choice to one of two RINO’s?

There is a third option that you are completely ignoring...one that if Conservatives would unite behind instead of getting wrapped up in the drama and trying to find some 100% pure candidate...would trounce Obama.


198 posted on 01/29/2012 9:12:00 AM PST by txradioguy (Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]


To: txradioguy

Newt has his flaws, but he’s no RINO. That just ludicrous. He’s got a 90% lifetime ACU rating, higher than Santorum’s, which is in the mid-80s, and Paul’s, which is in the low-80s.

Romney is a liberal-leaning moderate, Paul is a libertarian. Santorum is a George W. Bush compassionate conservative, and Newt is a Reagan conservative. If you doubt that Newt is a Reagan conservative, just ask Nancy Reagan, Michael Reagan, Bud McFarlane, Art Laffer, Jeffrey Lord, Thomas Sowell, and a good number of other Reagan conservatives.

Those four who are running are it. Nobody’s getting in, and a brokered convention with some white knight riding in to save the day is pure fantasy. In the unlikely event someone does ride in to break a deadlocked convention, it is most probably going to be another worthless establishment moderate.


210 posted on 01/29/2012 9:35:10 AM PST by Josh Painter ("The only thing these 'investments' will get us is a bullet train to bankruptcy." - Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson