Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"The president thinks America would be better if it was no longer America"

Nails it.

1 posted on 01/28/2012 8:17:14 AM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bigbob

*bump*


2 posted on 01/28/2012 8:23:41 AM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

“Spartan America”

The concept of Spartan America lends a new meaning to Down-Lowbama’s phrase “got your back”.


3 posted on 01/28/2012 8:27:02 AM PST by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

President Obama IS disgusting.


4 posted on 01/28/2012 8:29:52 AM PST by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob; oblomov

In his speech about cutting the military, Obama savored again quoting President Eisenhower about maintaining balance in and among national programs, while confidently assuming no one remembers the thrust of the Military-Industrial Complex Speech. Eisenhower’s theme warned about maintaining proper balance between the private and public economies.

Eisenhower’s concern would now be the astronomical growth of social programs that remain sacrosanct ever since Johnson introduced Medicare and Medicaid. In contrast Defense has undergone real spending reductions; reductions placing Defense at 19% of the budget now from 47% in 1962. In contrast, HHS and SS have tripled to nearly half today’s budget.

He would be astounded Obama proclaims a receding tide of war. Eisenhower understood Eleanor Roosevelt initiated us into unending international conflicts when proclaiming her Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Ronald Reagan gave practical expression to this ideal when defeating the “Evil Empire”, and the last three presidents have prosecuted the GWOT.

Bin Laden’s death or crippling of al-Qaeda hardly constitutes victory. Victory requires seeking out and supporting anonymous, selfless individuals and constituencies willing to endanger their lives and those of their families for durable economic models and representative governments. Such governments bring GWOT victory by frustrating plans, breaking alliances and fracturing terrorist organizations into ever less effective units.

However, Obama can rely upon a morbidly obese Pentagon bureaucracy as exampled by a Navy, which has more Admirals than commissioned ships. Washington will enthusiastically follow Obama to gut the ground forces, which provide an environment where potential leaders can experience deliverance from lives dominated by assassins stalking them and their families.

I suppose I could go with reorganization directed to more trigger pullers and fewer ticket punchers, but I would not favor any reduction in force. Somewhere in an old letter I did, I was able to calculate that if the active forces had incurred only the reductions Bush #1 proposed, our later reliance on reserve and National Guard forces would be about one third of that experienced.

The only way to reduce forces now is to abandon the principle in place since the end of WW II that the military must be able to fight two conventional wars at the same time. The war plan analyses that validate such a future world have got to be Ivy League fantasies.

His ignorance could be interpreted as a human failing, if it were not driven by passionate arrogance.

Bureau of Economic Analysis: Table 3.16 Government Current Expenditures by Function
http://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb/TableView.asp?SelectedTable=119&Freq=Year&FirstYear=2009&LastYear=2010

Remarks by the President on the Defense Strategic Review
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/01/05/remarks-president-defense-strategic-review

Military-Industrial Complex Speech, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1961
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/eisenhower001.asp


5 posted on 01/28/2012 8:41:51 AM PST by Retain Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

Mr. Goldberg makes some astute observations. But I think he misses the main point.

What Dewey, Carnegie, et al. wanted was not a Spartan America, but a regimented America. (Of course, “regiment” is a martial term.) The government school system they designed was derived from Austrian society, and aimed at creating a regimented society here, in which the common folk could be controlled and directed, trained to unthinkingly follow orders as a regiment marching on the battlefield. Good little citizens and good little industrial laborers, trained in school to study or cease studying, according to the dictates of the bell, and later to live factory-work lives by the bell. Regimented, unnatural, artificial lives, begun in childhood.

(We all like our school athletics programs, with our own colors, uniforms, mascots, bands, fight songs, etc. Ever notice their similarity to the locale-based regiments of Europe during the colonial period?)


6 posted on 01/28/2012 8:47:52 AM PST by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob
Ubama envisions two Americas.

Him, and everybody else.

7 posted on 01/28/2012 8:50:52 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (FOREIGN AID: A transfer of money from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

Nothing like praising the troops while cutting 100,000 of them, leaving us weak.

Even Panetta admitted that.


8 posted on 01/28/2012 8:57:28 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

I like the fact that he demeans the military while attempting to glorify himself. I like it because he, and perhaps those who follow him, will eventually be despised by the military. It is always best to despise an enemy. Loving that enemy will, in the end, yield nothing but defeat.


9 posted on 01/28/2012 9:17:42 AM PST by davisfh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

I could swear that everything that's going on in business and government these days was written by Ayn Rand

Mark

11 posted on 01/28/2012 9:47:39 AM PST by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

Seals Team 6 killed Osama Bin Laden. They have been training to do so since 9-11. Barry the Imposter was only turning 40 at that time, & he was not the person who started the ball rolling to kill OBL.

Obama has managed to almost kill the entire USA. He started on that path when he was still using a pacifier!!!

He didn’t pull the trigger or do all the training, either!!!

His touting that ‘he killed OBL’ is just plain disgusting to me.


12 posted on 01/28/2012 10:02:59 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

Obama,like most communists, wants to force the standard of living for Americans to that of North Koreans. Except of course for him and his commie/muslim would-be overlords.


13 posted on 01/28/2012 10:51:37 AM PST by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson