Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tennessee Nana
DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.

Exactly. Obvious conspiracy

53 posted on 01/27/2012 9:05:35 AM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: paul51

Now, was it just my misunderstanding that the original wording had “constitutionally qualified”, but Nanzi withdrew that and replaced it with one without the language?


63 posted on 01/27/2012 9:18:39 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: paul51

“DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.
Exactly. Obvious conspiracy”

I’d like to get ahold of Gore and Kerry’s paperwork and see if this is something that the DNC always does, or if it is something that they did just for Obama.


88 posted on 01/27/2012 11:23:56 AM PST by Noamie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson