Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OBAMA ELIGIBILITY TRIAL....BLOW BY BLOW
BLOG NEWS ^ | January 26, 2012 | Craig Andresen

Posted on 01/27/2012 8:02:50 AM PST by freedommom

Given the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a lot of explaining to do. His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of course, was Obama.

The following is a nutshell account of the proceedings.

Promptly at 9am EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia eligibility case were called to the Judge’s chambers. This was indeed a very interesting beginning to this long awaited and important case.

The case revolved around the Natural Born clause of the Constitution and whether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the point, if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012 ballot in Georgia.

With the small courtroom crowded, several in attendance could be seen fanning themselves with pamphlets as they waited for the return of the attorneys and the appearance of the judge.

Obama himself, who had been subpoenaed to appear, of course was nowhere near Georgia. Instead, Obama was on a campaign swing appearing in Las Vegas and in Colorado ignoring the court in Georgia.

Over the last several weeks, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, had attempted several tactics to keep this case from moving forward.


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; eletion; eligibility; naturalborncitizen; obama; orlytaitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last
To: faucetman

That is not what he says on the video. Check it again, he does state his dad was “born” in Mexico.


81 posted on 01/27/2012 9:51:35 AM PST by Mr. Wright (N\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Josephat

I feel like screaming, too. :)


82 posted on 01/27/2012 10:03:30 AM PST by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

The middle three numbers of your SS# indicate what state you received the number in. Obummer’s middle three numbers [i think 104] indicates that he was issued the card in CT. He never lived in CT. After years of investigation there is not one other case [other than Obama’s] that someone was given the wrong number.


83 posted on 01/27/2012 10:07:47 AM PST by Why So Serious (There is no cure for stupidity!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MrB
I believe the one he currently has has been shown to have been numerically constistent with SSNs issued in 1890 in Connecticut, a state he was never in during his childhood.

Wow, 1890. That alone should prove it's fake.
84 posted on 01/27/2012 10:09:35 AM PST by crosshairs (Liberalism is to truth, what east is to west.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

I understand that hillary is stepping down from her position as Secretary of State. Coincidence?


85 posted on 01/27/2012 10:12:45 AM PST by oldfart (Obama nation = abomination. Think about it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia

I wonder how an ordinary citizen would treated if the court were faced with the same SS issues?


86 posted on 01/27/2012 10:32:22 AM PST by unique1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: unique1

Best I could understand (audio was horrible at the court hearing yesterday) from the former INS immigration fraud investigator, he would bring a criminal case for immigration fraud to the DOJ. If the DOJ wouldn’t take it, he would have a warrant issued for the person’s arrest & have them in court to determine deportation status.


87 posted on 01/27/2012 10:44:14 AM PST by MissMagnolia (Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: paul51

“DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.
Exactly. Obvious conspiracy”

I’d like to get ahold of Gore and Kerry’s paperwork and see if this is something that the DNC always does, or if it is something that they did just for Obama.


88 posted on 01/27/2012 11:23:56 AM PST by Noamie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Noamie

There was an article at least a year ago that went into all this. I wish I could locate but can’t. Someone else may be able to. Anyhow, it was very clear that there was an obvious attempt by the dems to cover zero which broke protocol with the past for the DNC. At the time, anyone questioning zero’s eligibility was automatically labeled a lunatic birther so it didn’t get much legs but I thought it was very compelling.


89 posted on 01/27/2012 11:33:36 AM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: paul51

here is a good one I found earlier this morning. Of course it wasn’t written by our LSM . . . from Canada . . . seems we have to get some of our news from Canada or the UK these days.

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/15127


90 posted on 01/27/2012 11:35:52 AM PST by Qwackertoo (Gingrich/West 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Why So Serious
The middle three numbers of your SS# indicate what state you received the number in.

???

SS# Format is XXX-XX-XXXX

91 posted on 01/27/2012 11:37:14 AM PST by Petruchio (I Think . . . Therefor I FReep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Noamie
quick follow up: I recall there were copies of the usual documents that were signed and dated and then also altered documents that were signed and dated by the same people. The implication was, they would have known they were signing two sets of documents that were different and why that would be necessary. I'm pretty sure polosi was one of the signers
92 posted on 01/27/2012 11:38:29 AM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Qwackertoo

Yes! Excellent. That is exactly the one I was trying to recall. I have still never heard or read any reasonable rebuttal.


93 posted on 01/27/2012 11:42:26 AM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Petruchio
SORRY, FIRST 3

MINE MUST BE FAKE TOO

94 posted on 01/27/2012 11:53:03 AM PST by Why So Serious (There is no cure for stupidity!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: paul51

click on the authors name at the bottom of the article for several more interesting columns he has written since the one I linked to above.


95 posted on 01/27/2012 12:00:38 PM PST by Qwackertoo (Gingrich/West 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: freedommom
From what I'm reading... this case may be a little different from what we have expected.

The judge is an administrative law judge and apparently he issues not a ruling in this type of case, but a "recommendation" and then, the final decision as to whether Obama's name appears on the ballot rests with the Secretary of State.

The judge does not issue any true ruling that is binding on anybody and it's the Secretary of State who is subject to the political pressure involved regardless of what the judge does recommend.

Further, the failure to appear does not automatically result in a default judgement, the judge can still rule on "the facts" as he sees them, not necessarily default to ruling in the plaintiff's favor because the defendant failed to appear.

I am suspecting this one also will be swept aside without a true ruling on the merits of the case. But I hope I'm wrong

96 posted on 01/27/2012 12:11:30 PM PST by Lloyd227 (Class of 1998 (let's all help the Team McCain spider monkeys decide how to moderate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Qwackertoo

thanks


97 posted on 01/27/2012 12:15:45 PM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: paul51

this from one of his articles sends chills down your spine!

DC knows what most Americans have yet to figure out…

Obama is NOT a natural born citizen no matter where he might have been born. Obama’s birth father was at no time an American citizen and on this basis alone, Obama cannot be a constitutionally qualified resident of the White House.

They know something else that the American people have yet to figure out…

The US Constitution no longer stands as the governing law of this land. Obama’s many unconstitutional policies, Czars, executive orders and statements provide the proof, and the fact that nobody in DC cares whether or not Obama is constitutionally qualified to be president of the United States should send a shiver down the spine of every red blooded American citizen, no matter their partisan agendas.

The people willing to ask the tough questions are deemed crackpots and conspiracy theorists, racists or bigots. But those tough questions should be obvious questions to all Americans and every president should have to answer those questions, no matter race, creed, color or party affiliation.

I fear that those questions will only be answered at the tip of pitch forks and torches one day. Sooner or later, the people will run out of patience with a system built to exclude them. When that day comes, I fear what methods will be employed and whether or not there will be a country left to save by then.

But sooner or later, one way or another, Obama will have to answer those questions. One day, the world will know who and what this man is and there will be a day of reckoning like no other in American history.

The longer it takes for that day to arrive, the more dangerous the situation will become. A man not even qualified to hold the office is using that office to destroy the greatest nation on earth. How much patience can the people be expected to display?

Obama is not eligible for the office he currently holds and everyone in a position to know - already know.

What they don’t know is how much longer they can keep it all a secret, or what will happen next.


98 posted on 01/27/2012 12:19:04 PM PST by Qwackertoo (Gingrich/West 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: CanuckYank

I’d have to go searching, but there was an article not too long ago by Philip Berg (who is continuing his own eligibility challenge) stating that the SS# is a red-herring at this point & not worth worrying about. He is working on the Minor vs Happersett opinion at the primary reason to challenge O’s eligibility.


99 posted on 01/27/2012 12:55:34 PM PST by Twotone (Marte Et Clypeo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Here’s a link that explains Romney’s eligibility...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2702624/posts


100 posted on 01/27/2012 1:04:53 PM PST by Twotone (Marte Et Clypeo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson