Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheCornerOffice; Blackyce

Thank you! Rush collected all the “impeccable source” manure, loaded it into the spreader and covered the enormous field of his audience with anti-Gingrich crap.

It’s what he does not say that is most telling. He does not say anything in Newt’s defense.


63 posted on 01/27/2012 8:05:08 AM PST by Lady Lucky (A tea party in name only is worse than no tea party at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Lady Lucky
Now, in Rush's defense, I must say that he has always been very consistent in defending conservative ideas, perhaps more than he has defended individuals. He may be just trying to walk a fine line of avoiding an endorsement for whatever reasons.

But it did seem that while acknowledging the orchestrated attempt of many to bury Newt with accusations, he didn't do enough to refute them. Perhaps after more research and show prep, he'll follow up today with a different view on it... hoping that's the case.
65 posted on 01/27/2012 8:21:27 AM PST by TheCornerOffice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: Lady Lucky

Rush tried to assassinate Gingrich yesterday, and he got in our faces and mocked us as he was doing so.

This is now five years that Rush has tried to get Romney into the White House.

Rush and Drudge were the worst of a day that will go down in conservative history as ‘Bloody Thursday’ and the day that might become credited as the day that Romney won the nomination.


73 posted on 01/27/2012 1:03:24 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson