If your country had been held in slavery by the British, raped, mass murdered, and looted (including exporting food from Ireland while the people were starving) you wouldn’t find the conduct so disgraceful. In fact if you did think it was OK to support such people, then you’d be as big a dirtbag as the scummy British were. And by the way, it was recently admitted that Churchill started the terror bombing in WWII when they found themselves losing the war. So murdering German civilians was OK as long as it supported the war effort? Churchill was just as big a stinker as Hitler ever was. You have just bought into English propaganda. Churchill himself said at Nuremburg that had the Allies lost the war that he would have been in the dock. Most people think this was because even though innocent that those nasty Germans would have been picking on him. Churchill however, knew better. He was a highly literate murdering bastard.
Had Black Americans refused to support the war effort in 42 and worked to sabotage it, would you agree that they were justified. Please don’t lecture me on the Famine. My maternal great great grandfather came here in Black 47, his son went up Mayre’s heights in the 69th NYV. If you can look at Hitler and Churchill and see the same person you’ve as poor a grasp on historical reality as Pat Buchanan. Also, the mass bombings did not begin until we had joined the war. The night bombimgs of Britain began in full after September of 40 at a time when the RAF had too few four engine bombers to conduct any more than nuisance raids on the Reich. And the two greatest terror raids, Hamburg in 43 and Dresden in 45, were bonfires compared to Tokyo in March of 45 by the XX Air Force. Do you condemn that raid which killed over 100,000 civilians?