Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Nancy Pelosi knows about Newt Gingrich
The Daily Caller ^ | January 26, 2012 | Robert Laurie

Posted on 01/26/2012 6:03:07 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

To conservatives, she’s public enemy number 2. Only President Obama himself elicits more anger and outrage from those on the right. While she’s constantly decried as a monstrous villain, she’s been unfortunately effective for the left, particularly in ramming the unpopular Obamacare through Congress. Republicans have been woefully ineffective at minimizing her power and even though she’s no longer the speaker of the House, she’s remained the most visible Democrat other than the commander in chief. So, when Nancy Pelosi claims to “know something” about Newt Gingrich, it’s easy for nervous Republicans to joke that they’re surprised to learn she knows anything at all.

They take her claim lightly at their own peril.

This is not to say she has any actual dirt on Gingrich. After all, if you’ve got a hole card that will destroy an opponent, you don’t announce it. You play it close to the chest, and unleash it at the perfect moment for maximum damage. Pelosi’s willingness to brag about her supposed anti-Newt doomsday device likely means she doesn’t have one.

Still, there’s something about Newt that she knows. If we take her at her word, we can surmise that she probably knows three things.

1.) Bold people tend to overwhelm the weak.

In 2008, the bigger, bolder candidate was undoubtedly Barack Obama. Regardless of how you feel about his policies or ideology, there’s no denying the fact that in terms of sheer bravado, he trounced his Republican rival. Obama claimed to be the candidate who would restore the country, turn back global warming and lower the sea levels. Four years later, it’s hard to remember a single McCain idea. His plans were murky, his goals were ill-defined and his ability to achieve them was barely articulated.

Newt Gingrich, on the other hand, is swinging a sledgehammer of grandiose claims. Whether or not he can get his agenda through Congress is, at least for Pelosi, not the point. She learned from the 2008 campaign that in terms of electability, the claim is the thing. As Barack Obama proved, if you can convince people that you’re capable of achieving great things, they’ll follow you.

Obama no longer has the power to do this, so Pelosi is desperately afraid of anyone who can.

2.) Voters love a fighter.

In 1980, voters were not supposed to fall for Reagan’s shtick. According to the Republican establishment and their Democrat counterparts, they were supposed to believe that he was a doddering ex-movie star whose finest days were spent co-starring with a far more popular simian. He’d been divorced. He was from Hollywood. He’d been on both sides of the political aisle. He was not presidential material.

Then, he decided to start fighting. Once Reagan came out swinging against the failures of the Carter administration, he was unstoppable. His jabs are now the stuff of political legend. Now, Pelosi sees Newt doing the same thing to a president whose destructive policies make Jimmy Carter’s train wreck look like amateur hour.

3.) People will forgive personal flaws in a leader.

Yes, Newt has a lot of personal baggage. There’s no getting around that fact. His marital life is a decades-long mess and his tenure as speaker ended on an ugly note. However, he’s also able to strike the tone of a real leader. Again, regardless of whether you like or detest his policies, if you’re being honest with yourself, you’ll be forced to admit that Newt sounds like a man who can lead. You may not always be thrilled with where he’s taking you, but Pelosi knows that on Election Day this may not matter.

If her only current goal is to keep a Democrat in the White House, she must be terrified of Newt’s ability to fire up his political base.

It’s unlikely that Nancy has the goods to destroy Newt. If she actually did, she’d be salivating over the prospect of him winning the Republican nomination. As it is, she and her left-wing cronies have taken to the Sunday talk shows in order to remind conservatives, over and over again, that their party would be better off with Mitt Romney. Only Mitt, they say, is a danger to Obama — and we’re supposed to believe she’s warning us out of the goodness of her heart.

Sadly, so far Mitt has shown himself to be an obsequious, if flawless, man who lacks the ability to lead his own people and is reticent to fight. He’s exactly the type of candidate that Nancy Pelosi “knows” will be easy to defeat, just as John McCain was in 2008.

The next time Pelosi alerts us that there’s “something she knows,” we’d do well to remember that the source of such generous advance knowledge views a Republican victory as a cataclysm. The only thing that matters to a woman like Pelosi is her agenda. A strong Republican is exactly what she doesn’t want. She’s not interested in helping conservatives succeed, and she could care less if they pick a worthy nominee.

Her claims are best ignored.

Robert Laurie is a Michigan-based conservative columnist and freelance writer. He runs a daily political commentary blog at RobertLaurie.net.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gingrich2012; gopprimary; leadership; politicalhack
Now take a look at this!

The GE Years: What Made Reagan Reagan [Newt said this book explained Ronald Reagan's leadership]

1 posted on 01/26/2012 6:03:11 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
[S]o far Mitt has shown himself to be an obsequious, if flawless, man who lacks the ability to lead his own people and is reticent to fight.

Obsequiousness (fawning insincerity and inauthenticity) and an inability to lead are HUGE flaws IMO.

Mitt is the Eddie Haskell of the GOP.

2 posted on 01/26/2012 6:11:59 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Newt: "Why vote for the guy who lost to the guy who lost to Obama?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
BTW CW, I commend you on your fine work for Perry. Sorry he did not fare better, but at least he pulled out with dignity.

That said, good to see you now fighting for Newt!

3 posted on 01/26/2012 6:17:42 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Newt: "Why vote for the guy who lost to the guy who lost to Obama?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Wow, what a read, both Ronny and Newt look good.

It's no wonder we all hold RR in such high esteem he was self converted from the dark side to the right side and it was all because of practical experience.

I'm on board with Newt and I'm looking forward to tonight's debate.

I told you I'd do the dishes for you for a week but since you never gave me a specific date/time the offer is like one of obama's promises, it's going to expire. Hehe

4 posted on 01/26/2012 6:20:58 AM PST by USS Alaska (Nuke The Terrorist Savages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

5 posted on 01/26/2012 6:23:06 AM PST by equaviator ( "There's a (datum) plane on the horizon coming in...see it?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Mitt would be the perfect presidential candidate - in a movie.

The real world is very different, however.


6 posted on 01/26/2012 6:23:38 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

We don’t need another spoiled rich kid in the White House.


7 posted on 01/26/2012 6:30:54 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Pelosi threatening Republicans about running Newt (because she wants Romney against Obama) is a good thing.
8 posted on 01/26/2012 6:36:46 AM PST by Vision ("Did I not say to you that if you would believe, you would see the glory of God?" John 11:40)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision

Someone with spine and guts should be exposing Pelosi’s dirt and Zero’s dirt. Time to climb in the RAT sewer and fight them using their tactics back on them.


9 posted on 01/26/2012 6:48:35 AM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

Looks as though the stain never made it to Nancy pelosi s blue dress


10 posted on 01/26/2012 6:48:40 AM PST by piroque ("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
Willard is the GOP's Goldman Sack candidate.

Leroy is no Conservative, but has a gift of spontaneous verbal attack likely to be able to destroy Zer0. It's going to be ugly, but Leroy is the better fighter.

11 posted on 01/26/2012 7:02:05 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Democrats - stuck in the fifth grade.


12 posted on 01/26/2012 7:18:03 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
“in terms of sheer bravado, he trounced his Republican rival. Obama claimed to be the candidate who would restore the country, turn back global warming and lower the sea levels. Four years later, it’s hard to remember a single McCain idea. His plans were murky, his goals were ill-defined and his ability to achieve them was barely articulated.”

All Obama did was read phony phrases from a teleprompter and parrot trite concepts like “hope and change” over and over again. The MSM did all Obama’s heavy lifting and provided the phony “bravado” the author speaks of.

The McCain campaign was a total disaster. It was poorly run with no message and no coherent thoughts. McCain's operatives engaged in constant infighting and sabotaged Sarah Palin. It seemed like McCain's staff wanted him to lose.

All Republicans have to do to win is to tell the truth. State the obvious facts in plain and simple language that people can understand and don't get distracted by the MSM and all the negative attacks.

13 posted on 01/26/2012 9:55:24 AM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska; RoosterRedux
"It's no wonder we all hold RR in such high esteem…"
And I thought this was in reference to RoosterRedux. ;-)
14 posted on 01/26/2012 11:36:07 AM PST by bksanders (I think I just had my backslashed on a carriage return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

She’s already back tracked claiming she really does not know anything new. She is a hack inside traitor.


15 posted on 01/26/2012 12:24:48 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bksanders
"It's no wonder we all hold RR in such high esteem…" And I thought this was in reference to RoosterRedux. ;-)

It's wasn't? Now I'm deflated!;-)

16 posted on 01/26/2012 12:57:50 PM PST by RoosterRedux (Newt: "Why vote for the guy who lost to the guy who lost to Obama?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson