Posted on 01/26/2012 6:03:07 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
To conservatives, shes public enemy number 2. Only President Obama himself elicits more anger and outrage from those on the right. While shes constantly decried as a monstrous villain, shes been unfortunately effective for the left, particularly in ramming the unpopular Obamacare through Congress. Republicans have been woefully ineffective at minimizing her power and even though shes no longer the speaker of the House, shes remained the most visible Democrat other than the commander in chief. So, when Nancy Pelosi claims to know something about Newt Gingrich, its easy for nervous Republicans to joke that theyre surprised to learn she knows anything at all.
They take her claim lightly at their own peril.
This is not to say she has any actual dirt on Gingrich. After all, if youve got a hole card that will destroy an opponent, you dont announce it. You play it close to the chest, and unleash it at the perfect moment for maximum damage. Pelosis willingness to brag about her supposed anti-Newt doomsday device likely means she doesnt have one.
Still, theres something about Newt that she knows. If we take her at her word, we can surmise that she probably knows three things.
1.) Bold people tend to overwhelm the weak.
In 2008, the bigger, bolder candidate was undoubtedly Barack Obama. Regardless of how you feel about his policies or ideology, theres no denying the fact that in terms of sheer bravado, he trounced his Republican rival. Obama claimed to be the candidate who would restore the country, turn back global warming and lower the sea levels. Four years later, its hard to remember a single McCain idea. His plans were murky, his goals were ill-defined and his ability to achieve them was barely articulated.
Newt Gingrich, on the other hand, is swinging a sledgehammer of grandiose claims. Whether or not he can get his agenda through Congress is, at least for Pelosi, not the point. She learned from the 2008 campaign that in terms of electability, the claim is the thing. As Barack Obama proved, if you can convince people that youre capable of achieving great things, theyll follow you.
Obama no longer has the power to do this, so Pelosi is desperately afraid of anyone who can.
2.) Voters love a fighter.
In 1980, voters were not supposed to fall for Reagans shtick. According to the Republican establishment and their Democrat counterparts, they were supposed to believe that he was a doddering ex-movie star whose finest days were spent co-starring with a far more popular simian. Hed been divorced. He was from Hollywood. Hed been on both sides of the political aisle. He was not presidential material.
Then, he decided to start fighting. Once Reagan came out swinging against the failures of the Carter administration, he was unstoppable. His jabs are now the stuff of political legend. Now, Pelosi sees Newt doing the same thing to a president whose destructive policies make Jimmy Carters train wreck look like amateur hour.
3.) People will forgive personal flaws in a leader.
Yes, Newt has a lot of personal baggage. Theres no getting around that fact. His marital life is a decades-long mess and his tenure as speaker ended on an ugly note. However, hes also able to strike the tone of a real leader. Again, regardless of whether you like or detest his policies, if youre being honest with yourself, youll be forced to admit that Newt sounds like a man who can lead. You may not always be thrilled with where hes taking you, but Pelosi knows that on Election Day this may not matter.
If her only current goal is to keep a Democrat in the White House, she must be terrified of Newts ability to fire up his political base.
Its unlikely that Nancy has the goods to destroy Newt. If she actually did, shed be salivating over the prospect of him winning the Republican nomination. As it is, she and her left-wing cronies have taken to the Sunday talk shows in order to remind conservatives, over and over again, that their party would be better off with Mitt Romney. Only Mitt, they say, is a danger to Obama and were supposed to believe shes warning us out of the goodness of her heart.
Sadly, so far Mitt has shown himself to be an obsequious, if flawless, man who lacks the ability to lead his own people and is reticent to fight. Hes exactly the type of candidate that Nancy Pelosi knows will be easy to defeat, just as John McCain was in 2008.
The next time Pelosi alerts us that theres something she knows, wed do well to remember that the source of such generous advance knowledge views a Republican victory as a cataclysm. The only thing that matters to a woman like Pelosi is her agenda. A strong Republican is exactly what she doesnt want. Shes not interested in helping conservatives succeed, and she could care less if they pick a worthy nominee.
Her claims are best ignored.
Robert Laurie is a Michigan-based conservative columnist and freelance writer. He runs a daily political commentary blog at RobertLaurie.net.
The GE Years: What Made Reagan Reagan [Newt said this book explained Ronald Reagan's leadership]
Obsequiousness (fawning insincerity and inauthenticity) and an inability to lead are HUGE flaws IMO.
Mitt is the Eddie Haskell of the GOP.
That said, good to see you now fighting for Newt!
It's no wonder we all hold RR in such high esteem he was self converted from the dark side to the right side and it was all because of practical experience.
I'm on board with Newt and I'm looking forward to tonight's debate.
I told you I'd do the dishes for you for a week but since you never gave me a specific date/time the offer is like one of obama's promises, it's going to expire. Hehe
Mitt would be the perfect presidential candidate - in a movie.
The real world is very different, however.
We don’t need another spoiled rich kid in the White House.
Someone with spine and guts should be exposing Pelosi’s dirt and Zero’s dirt. Time to climb in the RAT sewer and fight them using their tactics back on them.
Looks as though the stain never made it to Nancy pelosi s blue dress
Leroy is no Conservative, but has a gift of spontaneous verbal attack likely to be able to destroy Zer0. It's going to be ugly, but Leroy is the better fighter.
Democrats - stuck in the fifth grade.
All Obama did was read phony phrases from a teleprompter and parrot trite concepts like “hope and change” over and over again. The MSM did all Obama’s heavy lifting and provided the phony “bravado” the author speaks of.
The McCain campaign was a total disaster. It was poorly run with no message and no coherent thoughts. McCain's operatives engaged in constant infighting and sabotaged Sarah Palin. It seemed like McCain's staff wanted him to lose.
All Republicans have to do to win is to tell the truth. State the obvious facts in plain and simple language that people can understand and don't get distracted by the MSM and all the negative attacks.
"It's no wonder we all hold RR in such high esteem "And I thought this was in reference to RoosterRedux. ;-)
She’s already back tracked claiming she really does not know anything new. She is a hack inside traitor.
It's wasn't? Now I'm deflated!;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.