Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama eligibility hearing to be broadcast live
wnd ^ | 1/25/12 | Joe Kovacs

Posted on 01/25/2012 10:32:42 PM PST by Nachum

A political action committee which believes Barack Obama is not legally qualified for U.S. president plans a live broadcast of tomorrow’s hotly anticipated court hearing in Atlanta regarding Obama’s eligibility.

The Article II Super PAC says it will provide uncensored, gavel-to-gavel video coverage of the event beginning at 9 a.m. Eastern at this online address.

Based in Simi Valley, Calif., the PAC says it decided to act out of a sense of frustration, since most national news outlets have been ignoring the constitutional mandate that presidents be a “natural-born citizen,” which the PAC maintains is a person who is a child of two U.S. citizen parents.

“The PAC saw the need to do this last month, because of the often incomplete and biased coverage of this issue by mainstream news media and recently received permission from the court,” said director Helen Tansey, who will personally manage on-site efforts.

“After the office of the president of the United States was usurped by a dual-citizen candidate in 2008, the nation was awakened to the realization that the U.S. Constitution, in particular Article II and presidential eligibility, no longer matters to our elected representatives and the mainstream media,” the PAC says on its website.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; broadcast; certifigate; eligibility; georgiahearing; naturalborncitizen; obama; superpac
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Nachum

The feed is live now.


41 posted on 01/26/2012 5:45:59 AM PST by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ballplayer

SOS replied last night. Told them it would be a shame if they did not defend their position. Trial on.


42 posted on 01/26/2012 5:46:26 AM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

Let’s hope he’s DQ’d but he and his thugs are slick as eel snot so I’ll believe it when I see it.


43 posted on 01/26/2012 5:53:49 AM PST by MissMagnolia (Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

I believe he said “Do so at your own peril”.


44 posted on 01/26/2012 5:54:04 AM PST by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyP
Additional feed:

Live Feed

45 posted on 01/26/2012 6:00:07 AM PST by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Dan(9698); ballplayer
There isn't one because the judge told the plaintiffs they didn't need to file one. That means he doesn't need one because that after reading the defendants answer, he has pretty much decided to rule in favor of the plaintiffs. If you have read his order on Obama’s motion to dismiss, this is clear.
46 posted on 01/26/2012 6:14:47 AM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Godebert

Any Black Panthers out front of the court house?


47 posted on 01/26/2012 6:26:25 AM PST by FishinTX (kill terrorists, protect the border, punch hippies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: FishinTX

Unless they read Freerepublic, how would they even know about the hearing?


48 posted on 01/26/2012 6:33:55 AM PST by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Godebert

Can you understand what he’s saying?


49 posted on 01/26/2012 7:00:26 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Couldn’t the judge just ask - Do you have the BC with you or not? Stop with all the semantics!


50 posted on 01/26/2012 7:15:03 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: battletank

VIA REGULAR MAIL & EMAIL

Michael Jablonski
260 Brighton Road, NE
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
michael.jablonski@comcast.com

RE: Georgia Presidential Preference Primary Hearings

Dear Mr. Jablonski:

I received your letter expressing your concerns with the manner in which the Office of State Administrative Hearings (”OSAH”) has handled the candidate challenges involving your client and advising me that you and your client will “suspend” participation in the administrative proceeding. While I regret that you do not feel that the proceedings are appropriate, my referral of this matter to an administrative law judge at OSAH was in keeping with Georgia law, and specifically O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5.

As you are aware, OSAH Rule 616-1-2-.17 cited in your letter only applies to parties to a hearing. As the referring agency, the Secretary of State’s Office is not a party to the candidate challenge hearings scheduled for tomorrow. To the extent a request to withdraw the case referral is procedurally available, I do not believe such a request would be judicious given the hearing is set for tomorrow morning.

In following the procedures set forth in the Georgia Election Code, I expect the administrative law judge to report his findings to me after his full consideration of the evidence and law. Upon receipt of the report, I will fully and fairly review the entire record and initial decision of the administrative law judge. Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to my review of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.

I certainly appreciate you contacting me about your concerns, and thank you for your attention to this
matter.

Sincerely,
Brian P. Kemp
Georgia Secretary of State


51 posted on 01/26/2012 8:04:36 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: djf

Death and taxes my friend, D&T’s.


52 posted on 01/26/2012 4:44:14 PM PST by bksanders (I think I just had my backslashed on a carriage return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

+1, Where are the highlight / replay?


53 posted on 01/26/2012 4:47:36 PM PST by bksanders (I think I just had my backslashed on a carriage return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson