Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I didn't see this posted.

It looks like Santorum is playing spoiler because evangelicals want social issues to be the top priority.

1 posted on 01/21/2012 10:53:55 PM PST by gogogodzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: gogogodzilla
The sources tell me that this is not for a Santorum win, though the evangelicals I spoke to continue to hope it is possible. This is to stop Newt Gingrich. One evangelical leader I spoke to said, “If Newt wins, we won’t be able to make family values an issue in the general.”

What in the Hell? Do they think that a pro-abortion Romney will be better for "family values"?????
2 posted on 01/21/2012 10:55:46 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gogogodzilla

Which is dumb. You can play the morality game all day long while you’re starving to death.


3 posted on 01/21/2012 10:56:58 PM PST by TheZMan (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2794639/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gogogodzilla

They want to shut this down?
http://www.newt.org/solutions/protecting-life-and-religious-liberty


4 posted on 01/21/2012 10:57:10 PM PST by ari-freedom (If SOPA passes, we will lose our Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gogogodzilla

It’s the economy, stupid!

(gogododzilla, stupid not directed at you :)


5 posted on 01/21/2012 10:58:18 PM PST by Explorer89 (And now, let the wild rumpus start!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gogogodzilla

This sure can’t be all Evangelicals, because Evangelicals right now are Newt’s strength, and Romney’s weakness.

80 percent of South Carolina GOP voters identified themselves as Protestants. Their vote breakdown was:
* 42% Gingrich;
* 27% Romney;
* 17% Santorum;
* 12% Paul.

13 percent of South Carolina voters identified themselves as Roman Catholic. Their vote breakdown was:
* 37% Gingrich;
* 29% Romney;
* 15% Santorum;
* 10% Paul.

When you split out the Evangelicals/born agains within the Protestant vote, they voted:
* 44% Gingrich;
* 22% Romney;
* 21% Santorum;
* 13% Paul.


6 posted on 01/21/2012 10:59:29 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gogogodzilla

Let’s wait and see. What you are saying doesn’t make sense. I am a Santorum fan but right now, Newt is running as a conservative, mentioning his family all the time. I don’t think hurting Newt at this point will help conservatism or family values.

Some insiders might know other shoes to drop against Gingrich, but Newt has weathered the attacks very well so far.

Let the race continue fair and square. I’m glad Santorum did well. Let them campaign. No one is “closer to Gd than thee” so let’s not have a religious war between them.


7 posted on 01/21/2012 11:00:13 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gogogodzilla

It looks like the RINOs in Washington want to use their cocktail party and country club money to try to blunt Mitt’s main competition. It would not matter whether they were social conservatives or fiscal conservatives. Who ever can help Mitt by taking out his main competition (Gingrich) will be flooded with money.

The elites are afraid of Newt. But they know Romney is too weak a candidate to fight him off alone.

You would think that evangelicals would know better than to take the blood money.

You would think the elites would realize how weak this makes Mitt look.


9 posted on 01/21/2012 11:00:49 PM PST by Waryone (Mitt Romney, the father of gay marriage and socialized medicine in the US, is a lying socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gogogodzilla
One lobbyist I spoke to said, “They [the GOP leaders in DC] are really nervous about Gingrich and they think he’d be a disaster. The best way to shut him down is to prop up Rick.”

and end up with Romney.

12 posted on 01/21/2012 11:03:53 PM PST by ari-freedom (If SOPA passes, we will lose our Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gogogodzilla

Well, that’s just nuts. Newt is a Christian. He’s confessed his sins, repented, asked for forgiveness and seeks redemption. I have full faith in his sincerity. Torpedoing Newt at this time will deliver the nomination to Romney and the election to Obama. How great can that be?


14 posted on 01/21/2012 11:05:03 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is not just brewing, rebellion is here!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gogogodzilla

FURS


15 posted on 01/21/2012 11:05:13 PM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gogogodzilla
Why in the world would the family values voter take a chance to allow Mitt (he's weak on pro life) in or Obama back in? They have to vote for what's best for the nation. Once the economy is working again, the family values will take care of itself. imo.
16 posted on 01/21/2012 11:05:45 PM PST by Christie at the beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gogogodzilla

Santorum won Iowa and came in only 10 points behind Romney in South Carolina. After what happened to Bachmann, then Perry, then Cain...it might be good to have one more parachute on hand in case Newt is next to stumble.


17 posted on 01/21/2012 11:05:45 PM PST by icwhatudo ("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the constitution"-Obama official)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gogogodzilla

Any Evangelical who thinks family issues is going to be the driving force behind this election is an idiot.

It’s going to be jobs, debt, economic performance, and the military.

All strong points with Newt.


18 posted on 01/21/2012 11:08:17 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gogogodzilla

We need to win over the santorum voters that can be won over and marginalize those that can not which means Rick Santorum needs to be mitigated, not eliminated. I want Santorum to stay in for a while. It gives us the opportunity to win over as many of his supporters as possible without immediately offending all of them and sending them teary eyed and angry into the Romney camp.


19 posted on 01/21/2012 11:08:52 PM PST by RC one (the majority of republicans agree, anyone but Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gogogodzilla

I wonder if what’s really happening is that these “evangelical leaders” are being asked by the GOP establishment to be money launderers to funnel money to Santorum without it looking like he’s getting money from the establishment, but getting it from evangelicals. While the launderers gets to keep part of this money for their role.


24 posted on 01/21/2012 11:12:25 PM PST by Truthsearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gogogodzilla

‘One evangelical leader I spoke to said, “If Newt wins, we won’t be able to make family values an issue in the general.”’

Pretty stupid logic. Christianity requires repentance and reform, not perfection. Even Jimmy Carter understood that. Pity this ‘evangelical leader’ does not.


25 posted on 01/21/2012 11:13:06 PM PST by Psalm 144 (Preparation ZOT, for prompt relief from annoying romnoids.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gogogodzilla
It looks like Santorum is playing spoiler because evangelicals want social issues to be the top priority.

How is Rick a spoiler. Voters vote the way they want. Making veiled attacks at Social Conservatives is nonsense. Newt won tonight and that makes it a win for all candidates so far state wise.

28 posted on 01/21/2012 11:15:54 PM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gogogodzilla
One evangelical leader I spoke to said

If he's actually a leader he can give his name, otherwise the whole report is nothing but hearsay.

31 posted on 01/21/2012 11:19:05 PM PST by eclecticEel (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness: 7/4/1776 - 3/21/2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gogogodzilla

What? People outside of South Carolina might not be open marriage fans?


32 posted on 01/21/2012 11:21:14 PM PST by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gogogodzilla

I respect Santorum, though I believe and have believed that he cannot be elected president.

Something about his personality fails to inspire, that is just a reality. Something I learned from my younger brother is that he is also viewed as “too conservative” by some for whatever its worth.

People need to understand that this is about defeating Hussein Obama, and for that we need a fighter.

I do not believe that this is a time to die on the hill of idealogical purity and perfection.

This is the time to defeat our homosexual communist muslim racist president.

Let’s roll!


35 posted on 01/21/2012 11:22:13 PM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson