To: submarinerswife; jennychase
Should Palin endorse him, consider the face on right NOW. Money would flow better and the public would awaken and pay attention.
She is who a large number of people would pay attention to. It would awaken and put life into the race. Welcome the possibility of that.
405 posted on
01/21/2012 5:44:11 PM PST by
JSteff
((((It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.))))
To: JSteff
As I understand your electoral laws, Palin cannot endorse any candidate.
It’s why Todd endorse Gingrich, as a stand-in for her. It’s also why she suggested that if she were a South Caroliner, she would ‘probably’ vote for Gingrich.
She just can’t come straight-out and say so.
434 posted on
01/21/2012 5:53:32 PM PST by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
To: JSteff
If Palin wants to stick it in the eye of the Country Club she would start campaigning for Newt. Throw some gasoline on the fire.
437 posted on
01/21/2012 5:54:54 PM PST by
bray
(More Batting Practice for the Bambino)
To: JSteff
I think she is not endorsing now out of a pretty smart strategy. She wants to support the nominee no matter which one it is and I think that she is waiting for tactical reasons.
She will bring in a ton of relevance with her endorsement.
658 posted on
01/21/2012 11:30:17 PM PST by
submarinerswife
(Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, while expecting different results~Einstein)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson