Posted on 01/20/2012 10:59:14 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Leftists, MittBots, PaulBots, RINOs, Karl Rove establishment types and trolls of many stripes and colors have one-by-one driven our leading grassroots conservative candidates out of the race. They worked for years on Palin, then Perry, then Cain, then Bachmann, now Newt. When ever a non-establishment, non-RINO conservative gets into the lead they open fire and 24/7 trash and torpedo until they drive them out.
NO MORE!!
If you want to troll and trash our conservative candidates, take your business elsewhere! PaulBots can take it to a liberaltaraian site. RomneyBots to FOX News. RINO trolls to the NY Times. Lib trolls to DU. Abortionist/statist trolls to hell. I don’t care where you go, but if you’re here to trash Newt 24/7, I’m gunning for your azz!!
REBELLION IS HERE!!
WAR IS HELL!!
DON’T TREAD ON ME!!
Zealots?
Jiom’s site, Jim’s rules.
Don’t like it Burke and Bert, take it up with teh site owner.
“Jim’s site, Jim’s rules.”
Absolutely. Hence my question relating to what Jim is and isn’t allowing when it comes to posts asking questions relating to Newt. That’s all.
“Please point out on this thread where I’ve bashed Newt!”
You have a terrible time with reading comprehension. Seriously. Your reading level is that of a second grader.
I never said you bashed Newt, I said you keep looking for ways to do so.
“A simple yes or no answer”
What part of my reply, “Jim has made his position PERFECTLY clear: FR will not be used to bash Newt. Period”, is so unclear that you cannot understand that it means “No!”?
Seriously, I feel like I am talking to a child.
Me: “No, you may not have a cookie.”
Child: “Can I have a cookie if...”
Me: “No cookies. Period.”
Child: “What if...”
Newt!
“Zealots go witch hun”
Zealots? Seriously? You don’t even know the definition of that word.
“Jim has made his position PERFECTLY clear: FR will not be used to bash Newt. Period.”
The question being asked is what constitutes “bashing” and what constitutes “asking legitimate questions relating to the candidate’s positions on the issues?” Is it FR’s policy that the latter is also forbidden? It’s telling you’re unable to differentiate between the two though not surprising considering your vulgar responses.
Bashing is constantly using info that has been disproved, constantly posting it despite it being disproved, and constantly ignoring that it has been disproved.
Like a certain poster the other night that went three for three by posting not one but three outright lies in an effort to bash Newt.
[They were a Romney supporter if memory serves.]
“Bashing is constantly using info that has been disproved, constantly posting it despite it being disproved, and constantly ignoring that it has been disproved.”
Legitimate. I’d recommend threads not be pulled however. If bad info isn’t exposed and left in plain view, how will others not pick up on that?
Bacause the people posting it have friends who will just post it again.
And some people will not read the correct info, but instead will take the disproved data and run with it.
[Just like CBS with the Killian memos and the mysterious fake CNN memo that the media recently ran with, same behavior.]
WOW!
Newt Gingrich is exactly who America needs! No one else has both the capability to win and undo what Obama has done to America over the last 3+ years.
Mitt Romney is not conservative enough.
Ron Paul is not conservative enough.
Rick Santorum may be decent but all he is doing is splitting the conservative vote.
Newt Gingrich is the man!
Go Newt!
Exactly. Dead on. Bad information will be used and propagated regardless if it was disproved later in the thread. That is why bogus threads and posts are deleted.
I figured that out without having to ask anyone.
It’s pretty much common sense on that.
Sorry about that, GB, that post #500 was intended for KB. I forgot to add her to the To list.
I know you have not said negative things about Newt, however, you did mention the zottings and I wanted to add in why. We simply cannot tolerate bashing of our candidate, and that includes Rick Santorum if he gets the nomination, no matter what. Any and all negative comments hurt our cause and why would Jim allow that? I am happy as Hell that Jim isn’t allowing that. It is about time we stand and get our guy into office instead of accepting deafeat because he isn’t perfect to our liking.
“I figured that out without having to ask anyone. It’s pretty much common sense on that.”
Yep, unfortunately, many are having to be reminded not to bash our candidate but to bash theirs.
“vulgar responses”
Typical. I get that from children like yourself. You don’t even know the definition of vulgar, you just don’t want to be held accountable for your own actions and anyone that does hurts your feelings. I couldn’t care less. Grow up.
Quite a few people have no problem with RINOism.
That touchy feely good big tent “embrace the lefties because we want them to like us” crowd.
That’s part of who we are up against.
Mitt Romney is not conservative at all. But he’s not a Massachusetts moderate. He’s a Massachusetts liberal!
Abortion, gay rights, gun control, support for government bailouts and take overs, taxpayer funded abortion, appoints liberal judges, supports gays in the military, and the biggie: RomneyCare and individual mandates!
We the people rebelled against ObamaCare but Romney continues to brag about his RomneyCare. Despite his protestations it’s the same damn thing. A big government socialist/fascist program forced on the people against their will!! He just doesn’t get it, never will because at heart, he is a big government establishment elite control freak LIBERAL who wants to do what HE feels is good for us even if he has to FORCE it on us!! He knows best what’s good for us little peons.
The Big Tenters are the worst. They do nothing but complain no matter the candidate. They are liberals but somehow got attached to the Republican party. They seem to enjoy Democrats winning. They make excuses about losing and then complain some more.
Screw them. Newt brought on the conservative Republican Revolution in 1993 and is back for more. I think he is after some revenge. The establishment Republicans went after him in 1994 for winning and embarrassing them and now he’s back to take the presidency. I hope like Hell he does.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.