“Please point out on this thread where I’ve bashed Newt!”
You have a terrible time with reading comprehension. Seriously. Your reading level is that of a second grader.
I never said you bashed Newt, I said you keep looking for ways to do so.
“A simple yes or no answer”
What part of my reply, “Jim has made his position PERFECTLY clear: FR will not be used to bash Newt. Period”, is so unclear that you cannot understand that it means “No!”?
Seriously, I feel like I am talking to a child.
Me: “No, you may not have a cookie.”
Child: “Can I have a cookie if...”
Me: “No cookies. Period.”
Child: “What if...”
“Jim has made his position PERFECTLY clear: FR will not be used to bash Newt. Period.”
The question being asked is what constitutes “bashing” and what constitutes “asking legitimate questions relating to the candidate’s positions on the issues?” Is it FR’s policy that the latter is also forbidden? It’s telling you’re unable to differentiate between the two though not surprising considering your vulgar responses.