Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum on Marianne Gingrich accusations: These are issues of character
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/20/santorum-on-marianne-gingrich-accusations-these-are-issues-of-character/ ^

Posted on 01/20/2012 5:18:17 PM PST by chessplayer

Rick Santorum walked a fine line in his response to questions about Marianne Gingrich’s accusations against her ex-husband and Santorum’s GOP rival, Newt.

“Personal matters are personal matters, but they are matters that are — particularly when you are in public life as he was at the time and the people involved were also in a sense in public life — those issues are issues that people will look at,” Santorum responded.

“I believe in forgiveness, I’m called to believe in forgiveness,” he continued. “I do believe having some accountability to a higher calling other than self is a very, very important aspect and perspective that is important for leaders.

“To make the final comment, these are issues of character and these are issues that people will consider based upon the time, when, where, how all those thing will factor in and I’ll let people make that decision, I’m certainly not going to make it for them,” he said to a crowd of about 150 people.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: santorum; santorum4romney; sourcetitlenoturl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-276 next last

1 posted on 01/20/2012 5:18:20 PM PST by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
Santorum would have been far wiser to simply not state anything verbally, and simply travel around with his family in moderately high visibility as a way of expressing his fidelity.

Gingrich's personal moral failings should indeed - and certainly will - come into voter's consideration when it comes to their choice. But to bring the matter up explicitly makes Santorum look desperate.

2 posted on 01/20/2012 5:25:13 PM PST by Yossarian ("All the charm of Nixon. All the competency of Carter." - SF Chronicle comment post on Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Newt has settled Commandment #7 with his maker. Get back to me when Ricky has done the same with #9.


3 posted on 01/20/2012 5:26:09 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Santorum is a sanctimonious self-serving blue-nosed jerk.

He will end up playing the same role the Huckster played in the last GOP primary, namely splitting the conservative vote giving the GOP a easily bested moderate who will not have the necessary passionate conservative grass roots support.


4 posted on 01/20/2012 5:26:54 PM PST by kimoajax (Rack'em & Stack'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

I like Santorum; I think it took guts to say what he said because it’s not the popular line. The popular line is to overlook Gingrich’s past abuse of wives. It shows a lot of hypocrisy, though, on the part of the blow-hards who condemned Clinton for his womanizing but are willing to turn a blind eye and deaf ear to Gingrich’s sleazy activities.


5 posted on 01/20/2012 5:26:58 PM PST by Saundra Duffy ( For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
The bigger problem is that Santorum wants to personally act as God.

Any person that wants to control the internet and the flow of information should not be elected dog catcher... let alone President.

Santorum blew it by supporting SOPA.
6 posted on 01/20/2012 5:28:52 PM PST by Minus_The_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

He needs to stop talking about this issue.
It would serve him better to just be quiet.


7 posted on 01/20/2012 5:29:35 PM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
“To make the final comment, these are issues of character and these are issues that people will consider based upon the time, when, where, how all those thing will factor in and I’ll let people make that decision, I’m certainly not going to make it for them,” he said to a crowd of about 150 people.

He's right. Time is getting short, and if Newt turns out to be our choice after SC them I'm in.

But we need to make sure we can defend our choice when his past is brought up, so let's chose carefully.

8 posted on 01/20/2012 5:30:03 PM PST by TwelveOfTwenty (Compassionate Conservatism? Promoting self reliance is compassionate. Promoting dependency is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian
Nice post, Yossarian.

"dittos" and nothing to add.

.

9 posted on 01/20/2012 5:30:15 PM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kimoajax

I never know who Huckabee kept from being the conservative president, who was it?


10 posted on 01/20/2012 5:31:23 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
“Personal matters are personal matters, but they are matters that are — particularly when you are in public life as he was at the time and the people involved were also in a sense in public life — those issues are issues that people will look at,” Santorum responded.

Better answer: "It's none of my business".
11 posted on 01/20/2012 5:32:12 PM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

Aren’t you worried that Santorum helps Romney?


12 posted on 01/20/2012 5:32:39 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

In the old days FR was a place where most folks would say if his wife can’t trust him how can the country.

These days Rick Santorum tripped Newt and Newt ended up coupled with Marianne and Calista while married to others.

Change you can believe in.


13 posted on 01/20/2012 5:33:06 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Santorum should have eliminated all the words from “but” to the end of his little speech. While the accusations are issues of character, they say much more about Marian Gingrich (who was investigated by the FBI for influence peddling from 1995 to 1997) and about John King, CNN, and the Lamebrains in the Media who ran with the accusations with utterly no proof. Oh, and did I mention that Santorum aligned himself with those of low character by not mentioning these are accusations by a woman scorned who appeared to be delivering a script written for her by someone else (maybe for $$$$).


14 posted on 01/20/2012 5:33:27 PM PST by MIchaelTArchangel (Romney ruined Massachusetts. Now he wants to ruin the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
Get back to me when Ricky has done the same with #9.

Or #11, for that matter.

15 posted on 01/20/2012 5:33:52 PM PST by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
You're fooling no one. The only reason you 'like' Santorum is because he can take votes away from Newt tomorrow to help your RINO hero Romney win in SC.

But that ain't happening. Mitt is going DOWN.

16 posted on 01/20/2012 5:34:10 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

And media hypocrisy for not saying a word about Kerry’s divorce, and John Edwards’ affair while his wife was dying. Santorum comes off as a priggish jerk.


17 posted on 01/20/2012 5:35:01 PM PST by Matt Hatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Santorum sounded like a hack.


18 posted on 01/20/2012 5:35:40 PM PST by Tribune7 (GAS WAS $1.85 per gallon on the day Obama was Inaugurated! - - freeper Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Note to Santorum. Butt out.


19 posted on 01/20/2012 5:37:57 PM PST by Cyber Liberty ("If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." --Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

And Santorum’s embarrassing prissiness will probably also gain visibility. Somebody tweeted after the debate last night that Santorum’s image was, “I saw that and I’m telling.”

He came across as an idea-free (since he has voted with the RINOs on everything) dweeb in a sweater vest who might be his mother’s beloved but sure as heck could never get elected President of the US. And the thing about how his “taxes were on his computer and there was nobody at home who could get them to him” probably would have made even his mother groan.


20 posted on 01/20/2012 5:38:23 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-276 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson