[FARS]

Hello! NBC can be achieved if the Obama Sr. father version is “discarded” and an affidavit from a natural born American claiming to be the biological father appears!

The scam is so deeply corruptive that a DNA switch is the least of the challenges Obambi faces when he declares himself the bastard natural born son of one of a couple of possible fathers.

“Sorry but I was trying to hide being an illegitimate child of xxxxx, (Malcolm?) or xxxx2 to protect their good name.....” will be the scenario to explain all the concealment. And thus, choosing the lesser of the two “evils/veils” to put the mantle of NBC around his own shoulders under the “bastard” cloak.

For some reason - pure speculation - I seem to sense things going in that direction.

DNA can be “arranged” or even contrived.

What say you all?

[little jeremiah]

But is this ad really from 0h0m0’s peeps?

I have thought that he/his string pullers might try to pull the “he thought the Kenyan was his biodad” and stick an American biodad in there for a NBC after all switcheroo.

But I think the evidence is weighted on the “not born in the US” side. As well as the ID of “the real BHO son of the Kenyan” was switched with the feller in the White House. There is an Obama in Ghana who was likely the real son of the Kenyan, born somewhere, mother Anna Obama...

There’s more to the identity of the feller in the White House than meets the eye, lot of research done on FR that only the super obsessed (moi and others) have digested. I surmise that the feller in the WH was brought to HI somewhere between the ages of 2 1/2 to 3, he took over (or the adults did it) the ID of the son of the Kenyan, and Stanley Ann was hired as nanny.

[little jeremiah]

Another factor is I think they are getting a bit rattled. His non-NBC status is getting out there - even the WaPo has an article about the GA judge and court appearance. And the Ulsterman interviews definitely point to the fact that there are Dems who fear and hate him.

They have also made a lot of mistakes and done a lot of flops. Whatever they try, I do not think they will succeed. Think of “AttackWatch”! So many other flops. And the mil hates him.

[thecodont]

Hello! NBC can be achieved if the Obama Sr. father version is “discarded” and an affidavit from a natural born American claiming to be the biological father appears!

The scam is so deeply corruptive that a DNA switch is the least of the challenges Obambi faces when he declares himself the bastard natural born son of one of a couple of possible fathers.

“Sorry but I was trying to hide being an illegitimate child of xxxxx, (Malcolm?) or xxxx2 to protect their good name.....” will be the scenario to explain all the concealment. And thus, choosing the lesser of the two “evils/veils” to put the mantle of NBC around his own shoulders under the “bastard” cloak.

For some reason - pure speculation - I seem to sense things going in that direction.

DNA can be “arranged” or even contrived.

What say you all?

--------------

A couple of things would seem to support your theory:

* BO's campaign's statement that release of his BC would be "embarrassing" and

* MO's statement that BO's mother was "very young and very single" when she had him.

Both statements are vague enough to provide grounds for this sort of new fabrication.

I know BO's supporters are credulous, but to ask them to swallow another quickly-revised version of his story ("American bastard" vs. the previous "Kenyan father") coated with spun sugar is a bit much.

His campaign can try to push this angle, but I don't know how successful it will be.

American ARE credulous, but woe betide the con men when the con is eventually found out.

I am reminded of the fate of the Duke and the Dauphin characters in Mark Twain's Huckleberry Finn.

[null and void]

DNA can be “arranged” or even contrived.

Yep. Especially when all his known relatives were cremated...

[bert]

———DNA can be “arranged” or even contrived.——

I say probably not. There can not be evidence grade DNA manipulation in my view

[davisfh]

I agree with you. The MSM will do anything to continue this guy in office and, in that regard, a lie troubles them not at all. The DNA thing is not a problem either. I strongly suspect that DNA was manipulated/substituted in a great number of cases where people previously found guilty of major crimes/murders were deemed not guilty and released on the basis of a DNA mismatch.

I have long thought that when a wealth of evidence points to the guilt of a person but the DNA doesn't match, it would be wise to take a look at the people constituting the lab that declared the mismatch. Of course, it would be considered politically incorrect to question the integrity and motives of the people trusted with a technical effort like DNA analysis. However, such analyses should be done "in the blind" so that the person doing the analysis has no knowledge of the person or crime for which he/she is providing information.

With these suspicions in mind, it would be wise to take a long, hard look at any evidence which might shed light on the parentage of Barack Hussein Obama. Any evidence brought forth in that regard will likely be of the "manufactured" genre. And, sadly, we have a very large number of people in this "republic gone awry" who will rush to embrace any data that will cast the "Miscreant-in-Chief" in the best light possible.

[ThanhPhero]

If more than a couple of states begin to work seriously at knocking Obama off the ballot I can surely see something like that. Then the leftists will start moaning loudly about the backwardness of a society that would force him to take such a subterfuge.

[potlatch]

I remember when I first found the Daily KOS birth certificate posted. It was a big deal at the time. Some of my original images somehow disappeared from my site but I had made this page;

http://domania.us/Oaccess/OBAMA/BirthCertificate.html

http://domania.us/Oaccess/ObamaBirthCertificate.gif

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[David]

Hello! NBC can be achieved if the Obama Sr. father version is “discarded” and an affidavit from a natural born American claiming to be the biological father appears! The scam is so deeply corruptive that a DNA switch is the least of the challenges Obambi faces when he declares himself the bastard natural born son of one of a couple of possible fathers.

The idea to identification of the parentage and origin is the original birth records. At the time a child is born, the doctor takes a print from each foot and incorporates it onto the original hospital birth record. Exactly how this record is preserved may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. In at least one state in the US, the doctor gets two sets of prints and one reposes in the state Health Department.

So on its face, identification of an adult to his birth records would be as simple as getting a print. And to the lawyer that print is an evidentary issue--witnesses of every stage with the print attested on the face of the print document under oath.

Now we have seen a vast array of fraudulent documents as we attempt to accumulate real evidence about the origin of zero. Significant criminal conduct is obviously involved. So the prospect of further fraud cannot be excluded.

On the other hand, if original documents exist, as I believe they do, modification of original prints incorporated in micro fiche records in at least one controlled location, in a birth file setting out a birth record consistent with the events as we now believe they occurred, may present a more difficult challenge for Opposing Forces than the Hawaii Health Department.

An argument based only on DNA is likely to rest on a factual inquiry into the evidence. It is possible that a conclusive chain of evidence might confirm the story--it is equally possible that it will not in which case the story would be rejected.

The legend that Zero's parentage might be the object of sufficient negative substance to merit an extensive effort to conceal it has been around long enough that we have not been able to trace its origin or the time when it was first heard. It appears to date before the original legislative campaign.

I have tended to ignore that story over the years for the reason that I didn't view it as credible--against a very positive election result in a national campaign, I just didn't believe there would be a sufficient incentive to maintain the cover up.

However as I have learned more about the actual underlying events, my views have to some degree shifted.

For one thing, his father was under an Islamic Death Edict which might well have included his father's male heirs. That Death Edict was ultimately the subject of action in which his father was assassinated. And the original cover up appears to originate in his father's objective to protect the son from the consequences of the threat and is consistent with that effort.

But another significant element of the objective has appeared.

His mother is of a different race than his father. Her personal and ethnic origin has been in continuing conflict with those of his father for several generations.

She was a very young single woman--19 at the time of his conception; 19 or 20 at the date of his birth. A member of a large family who were prominent in public Christian and political communities. She had a developing professional career of her own in which she has continued to prosper throughout the years with a fine reputation.

Although there is no way to prove it as yet, I infer from the limited factual background we know about that she did not tell her family of the birth. There is a gap in her professional career between the time it would have been apparent that she was pregnant and about three weeks after the probable birth date.

The birth appears to have occurred at some significant distance from any geographical location where she or her family or professional associates were active.

At this point, in my view, the political consequences of disclosure offer both difficulty and opportunity. It appears to me that if Gingrich is in fact the nominee, he is focusing on the underlying departure of Zero's policies from the foundational principles on which America was founded. Gingrich is now talking about vague distinctions that may result from knowledge of Zero's heritage which implies to me that his campaign may have penetrated the legend.

Zero's primary political exposure is that he is a complete fraud. Nothing you think you know about him is true. He is Anti-American; he is a historical Anti-American, Anti-Free Enterprise, Anti-American culture, Anti-Constitutional governance, Liberal Ends Justifies the Means politician.

That is a delicate political case to make. His position with respect to cover up of his origins is sympathetic--his parents were just attempting to protect him from adverse conditions that might have threatened him.

If Zero were a conservative; pro Constitution; pro-free enterprise candidate; we would welcome him with open arms. No one here would care who is father and mother were nor what their historical political activity involved.

So if the political objective is to be achieved, likely this is going to involve a challenging effort.

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks FARS.