Posted on 01/19/2012 9:34:13 AM PST by Nachum
The year-and-a-half-old ABC “scoop”, in which Newt Gingrich’s ex boasts her one interview could end her one time hubby’s political career, is more about the contemporary media than it is about a presidential candidate. The Daily Beast’s Howard Kurtz said a mouthful when he posited that Marianne Gingrich does not say anything in the new interview that she hasn’t said in the past.The Esquire already ran with the same story in September 2010, if anyone cares. Notice how quickly the story of another election-year smear has morphed over to WHEN ABC will air it.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
Sounds like this could apply to pretty boys “Clinton and Edwards” as well.
The fear in the DNC/media/street vermin is growing as Newt rises. Barry bassturd is in great danger of being exposed for the emtpy suit he is if he has to face Newt for the general election.
Yes, and that’s why I’m suggesting that the GOP look outside of the current crop of lemons, primaries and caucuses be damned. I don’t see how they can seriously be considered democratic.
I see now, it all started by an interview to the WP. Another liberal oulet.
If that’s your defense of Gingrich, he’s toast. Gingrich-bots, Romney-bots, Palin-bots, Paul-bots, Trump-bots...they all seem to have a problem dealing with reality. Politics is a less-than-zero sum game. They’re all good at preying on each other but they have little to offer, and that’s a sure-fire way to lose.
that’s not my defense of anything, that’s my indictment of you.
I am here to discuss ideas, and people when they are part of the discussion. You joined this forum yesterday, or was it today, to pimp a particular person.
Therefore, I’ve ended my conversation with you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.