Skip to comments.
Santorum has Iowa, Gingrich has Palin – and suddenly South Carolina is wide open
The London Telegraph ^
| January 19, 2012
| Dr. Tim Stanley
Posted on 01/19/2012 8:53:56 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
He can probably read a poll, but does he believe the polls?
What poll said Santorum would win Iowa?
41
posted on
01/19/2012 1:35:18 PM PST
by
DannyTN
To: Marcella
“I think people will be watching the debate at that time and not watching ABC.”
Me too. The debate is the big deal tonight.
42
posted on
01/19/2012 2:36:44 PM PST
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: Mr. K
what the heck? is someone hacking my account?
My ideal ticket would be Gingrich/Santorum- I meant to say
(I must have zoned out while I was typing that because it is one hell of a typo!)
43
posted on
01/19/2012 4:34:58 PM PST
by
Mr. K
(Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
To: Mr. K
Did you start the drinking game early? Just kidding, we’ve all shared in the occasional typo. :)
44
posted on
01/19/2012 5:06:17 PM PST
by
callisto
(Who is John Galt?)
To: LibsRJerks
Even Newts. Even mine. Even Clintons if he so chooses to repent. It still stands.Especially MINE!
45
posted on
01/19/2012 7:43:53 PM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
To: 2ndDivisionVet; SENTINEL
Thank you both!
I was in and out of the air force before ‘Nam got really hot.
I landed in Siagon when the airport was a sleepy little jungle strip and 18 months later I touched down there on the way home and it was being turned into FWD!!
46
posted on
01/19/2012 7:49:49 PM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
To: Mr. K
It’s yer darned tagline line.
CHANGE it!!!
47
posted on
01/19/2012 7:52:03 PM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
To: VanDeKoik
It also means that we have to revise the history books. Im not alone for having written that Mitt was unique in Republican history for winning Iowa and New Hampshire in a row....That was always an example of press bogosity -- Ford won IA and NH in 76
48
posted on
01/19/2012 7:58:17 PM PST
by
Cowman
(How can the IRS seize property without a warrant if the 4th amendment still stands?)
To: Windflier
I swear TO GOD I meant to type Gingrich/Santorum (for 16 striaght years of conservatism)
I must have really zoned out
49
posted on
01/20/2012 9:14:35 AM PST
by
Mr. K
(Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
To: Mr. K
I swear TO GOD I meant to type Gingrich/Santorum (for 16 striaght years of conservatism) I must have really zoned out Well, if we conservatives can forgive Newt, we can certainly forgive you for momentarily zoning out ;-)
50
posted on
01/20/2012 9:42:28 AM PST
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Rick Santorum won Iowa after all, perhaps by 34 votes. The Iowa GOP is calling it a draw. Why is that when Mitt was ahead by just 8 votes it was a Romney victory, but now Santorum is ahead by 34, its a draw? How true. I would love to see the one remaining social conservative pull off a miracle.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson