Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Five key senators abandon online piracy bills amid Web protests
The Hill ^ | January 18, 2012 | Brendan Sasso and Gautham Nagesh

Posted on 01/18/2012 3:08:55 PM PST by abb

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: abb
"When protecting intellectual property rights, we must not undermine free speech, threaten economic growth, or impose burdensome regulations,"...

DeMint 'gets it'....

21 posted on 01/18/2012 6:20:27 PM PST by GOPJ (GAS WAS $1.85 per gallon on the day Obama was Inaugurated! - - freeper Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inyo-Mono
"...will not affect any website that has any legitimate use," he said.

Oh really? And just who decides what websites are "legitimate?"

The 'committee' to decide who's legitimate and who isn't would carry great power - power to gather 'donations' from companies wanting favors.

The last thing we need is one more corrupt group fattening up our almost bribed out 'law' makers. Lawmakers enter congress as middle class - and in a few short years they're millionaires - this is how they get from point A to point B...

22 posted on 01/18/2012 6:26:35 PM PST by GOPJ (GAS WAS $1.85 per gallon on the day Obama was Inaugurated! - - freeper Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: abb
Toomey has also come out against it
23 posted on 01/18/2012 6:35:28 PM PST by Tribune7 (Vote ABR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Whatever about up/downloaders, I am certainly not in favor of an immigration amnesty.


24 posted on 01/18/2012 6:58:55 PM PST by evilC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: abb

Hundreds of millions of Internet users, most of whom might have been unaware of the bills until Wednesday, are likely to have noticed the protests.

Hundreds of millions have been unaware of the bills because the mainstream media has been hiding these bills hoping Congress would pass them behind our backs. The mainstream media and Congress are the enemy of liberty, freedom and the enemy of the people.

These bills are the worst attack against liberty that I have seen.

And Lamar smith the villain behind these bills has a backup bill PCIPA in case these fail. This PCIPA he says is to protect the children against pornography but has SOPA in it.


25 posted on 01/18/2012 7:12:39 PM PST by Democrat_media (China is destroying all our jobs and manufacturing ability. China makes everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media

Lamar reportedly sold his soul to this for only $100 grand. Surely Google could say to Lamar here, give the money back, we have $200 grand for you?


26 posted on 01/18/2012 7:19:40 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

“Leahy, the chief author of the Senate bill, said the protest is based on a misunderstanding of the legislation.”

Uhhh...I would say that the protest is based on an UNDERSTANDING of the legislation.


27 posted on 01/18/2012 9:12:08 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“Lamar reportedly sold his soul to this for only $100 grand. Surely Google could say to Lamar here, give the money back, we have $200 grand for you?”

Well, I wonder what _would_ happen if Google publicly offered this jerk double what he’s gotten for dropping it. Do you think anyone would have the guts to charge Google with bribing a public official? The trial would be vastly entertaining.


28 posted on 01/18/2012 9:15:33 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
"The PROTECT IP Act will not affect Wikipedia, will not affect reddit, and will not affect any website that has any legitimate use," he said.

Ain't it though? One of the few groups that I trust even less than the US Congress is MPAA/RIAA or whatever that stupid acronym is. And don't it figure that that crook Dodd is the doddering idiot in charge of it.

These politicians must be low-grade morons if they think that we don't see that this is the thin edge of the wedge that they've been trying to get their claws into the internet for years. Both US politicians and how many times have we heard about threatened UN internet taxes.

I need to hunt down that petition ;( Saw that google was blacked out but didn't click on it.

All that SOPA does is to set a precedent that govt can dismantle the internet and pull people's domain names and websites just because they don't tow the govt line. The govt decides what's "legitimate" and not.

Not for me anytime in the lifetime of this universe!

Scuzzy politicians ;(

Godspeed

29 posted on 01/18/2012 11:55:45 PM PST by HeartlandOfAmerica (Geithner: Taxes on 'Small Business' Must Rise So Government Doesn't 'Shrink')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

On Freerepublic we need to start a campaign to get rid of Lamar Smith ,Dodd, SOPA, and Leahy .


30 posted on 01/19/2012 2:47:19 AM PST by Democrat_media (China is destroying all our jobs and manufacturing ability. China makes everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie; HeartlandOfAmerica

Schumer, D-NY, and Gillibrand, D-NY, co-sponsors of PIPA, had protesters shouting outside their offices; the criminals of Anonymous busted the website of Holder’s so-called Department of Justice, Leahy’s doubling down looks like his last shriek on the retreat (and hopefully, retirement; he’s the current face on the We Need Term Limits movement), and you’ll notice very few (I saw zero, but maybe there were more) overpaid entertainers giving any encouragement at all to Congress.

Occutardation? No impact at all.

Internet censorship bills? Up in flames, the fascists backed down.

They will be back though.

No Republican should EVER back a bill like this — not even if every hollow idol of Hollywood suddenly endorsed the entire Republican slate of candidates, and we know that will never happen. IOW, since there’s no chance for their support, and every likelihood of their continued hostility, WHY WOULD YOU VOTE FOR IT?


31 posted on 01/19/2012 6:25:31 PM PST by SunkenCiv (FReep this FReepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: abb
Perhaps if these companies would participate constructively....

Shut up, Leahy. Your side had a chance to negotiate in good faith, and blew it off because you thought you'd just get you way without making any concessions.

Now that you've been pwned and come up empty-handed, you whine about "misunderstanding". Go away.

32 posted on 01/24/2012 2:48:41 PM PST by transducer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: transducer

Here was my contribution last week to the fracas. I like to think that my newsblog influenced Scalise to see the light.

http://lincolnparishnewsonline.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/scalise-removes-name-from-sopa-sponsorship-as-promised/
Scalise Removes Name From SOPA Sponsorship, as Promised

http://lincolnparishnewsonline.wordpress.com/2012/01/18/scalise-pulls-sopa-sponsorship/
Scalise Pulls SOPA Sponsorship

http://lincolnparishnewsonline.wordpress.com/2012/01/18/la-congressman-supports-internet-censorship/
LA Congressman Supports Internet Censorship


33 posted on 01/24/2012 2:56:24 PM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: abb
That is what debate on legislation is intended to do, to fine-tune the bill

No, fine-tuning is what happens when a bill is NOT up for a vote - what's debated when a bill is on the floor is yea vs. nay. Old fart Leahy doesn't even understand his own job - and we should believe he understands the Internet better than Wikipedia and reddit?

34 posted on 01/24/2012 3:04:07 PM PST by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

It was very dismaying when so many Republican Reps and Senators signed onto this piece of shyte. What’s the upside for a conservative to support such an awful Hollywood driven bill that totally messes up internet freedom, unless he is getting schmeared (paid off)


35 posted on 01/24/2012 5:08:38 PM PST by dennisw (A nation of sheep breeds a government of Democrat wolves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson