.. Ping!
“Thus we have two opposing viewpoints regarding the meaning of “natural born citizen”. Which viewpoint is correct?
Only the Supreme Court (not Congress, not the voters, not the consensus of American legal opinion) has the Constitutional authority to answer this question. President Obama has a duty to ask the Supreme Court for a declaratory judgment resolving all doubts with respect to his “natural born citizen” status.”
.but I can’t let this go.
Amos 3 and 3.
Until there are enough people willing to die for their country, there will be no way to force this Socialist out.
Can two walk together unless they be agreed? No!!!..not in America, not any more.
Rev....Woe to he that taketh that name, 666. Now with situation being as it is in reference to our present situation with no moral authority, how many today would take that name?
There is also the question of Obama possibly having Indonesian citizenship, an Indonesian passport and attending college on a foreign student scholarship as “Barry Sotero”
UPDATE (4/27/2011): Now that President Obama has released his long-form birth certificate, questions 31 through 34 in this Primer have become moot.is USELESS. It essentially confers validity upon the document image(s) Obama released or didn't release on April 27. But the images are not what they purport to be. This is so obvious that it is a wonder the Obama has been able to steer clear of prison and/or the hangman's noose.
ML/NJ
I dispute this assertion!
The Obama legal team has inserted layer upon layer of defensible legal distance between the White House (forged) LFBC pdf and Hawaii DOH on the one hand and also distance between the LFBC pdf and Obama himself.
The White House pdf image has NEVER been “legally released” as submitted evidence in any legal proceeding. Only one MSM reporter has claimed to have held a copy of the "original" of the HI certified LFBC and "felt the seal" and taken a low quality picture with her cell phone. br
Even on April 27, 2011 (a date that will live in infamy!) Obama’s lawyer went out of his way to state that Obama would not personally be holding in his hand at the press conference the “actual” alleged certified copy of the alleged photocopy of the alleged bound page from the alleged 1961 HI record book!!!
What does that tell you when Obama’s own lawyer won't let him hold the document that he is supposed to be affirming to be genuine???
Question No. 1 is extremely stupid. If this is a primer about presidential eligibility, then the “birther” label is irrelevant.
At the Missouri State Qualifications website, Missouri Dem SOS Robin Carnahan requires candidates to meet certain qualifications for the 2012 election. She includes U.S. Senators and Representatives all the way down to Township or Ward Committeemen.
http://www.sos.mo.gov/elections/elect_qalification.asp
However, I find it quite odd that Carnahan has neglected to list the Presidential candidate qualifications. Why is that? We all know there are Constitutional requirements to be President but Carnahan omitted them.
The lowly elected position of Township or Ward Committeemen and Committeewomen must meet certain qualifications – - -
*Resident of county and committee district 1 year next preceding the election
*Registered voter in county and district for 1 year next preceding the election
But no qualifications are listed for the President of the United States. Odd, don’t you think?
Oh, and by the way, qualifications for presidential candidates were also omitted from the website in the 2008 election.
http://www.sos.mo.gov/elections/2008primary/2008offices.asp