Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich wins debate, receives standing ovation
Human Events ^ | 1/17/2012 | Tony Lee

Posted on 01/18/2012 5:18:51 AM PST by IbJensen

Trailing Mitt Romney in the polls in South Carolina and with Rick Santorum​ in his rear-view mirror before the nation’s “first-in-the-South” primary in South Carolina, which will be held on Saturday, Newt Gingrich​ needed to bring the house down in South Carolina on Monday during the FOX News/Wall Street Journal debate in Myrtle Beach.

And he did.

Gingrich received a raucous standing ovation for his back and forth with liberal moderator Juan Williams​. Williams asked Gingrich if he could see how his comments about how “black Americans should demand jobs, not food stamps” were viewed, “at a minimum, as insulting to all Americans, but particularly to black Americans.”

“No,” Gingrich curtly said, using Williams as a perfect liberal foil. “I don’t see that.”

Gingrich said his daughter’s first job was doing janitorial work and “she liked earning the money” and “liked learning that if you worked, you got paid.” He said only elites “despise” giving people opportunities to earn money.

When Williams pressed Gingrich further, Gingrich said, "the fact is that more people have been put on food stamps by Barack Obama​ than any president in American history.”

Gingrich noted Obama’s failures in creating jobs, which has has left many communities even more desolate, and said he believed “every American of every background has been endowed by their creator with the right to pursue happiness.”

“And if that makes liberals unhappy, I’m going to continue to find ways to help poor people learn how to get a job, learn how to get a better job and learn some day to own the job,” Gingrich said.

Gingrich has said he has to win South Carolina in order for him to be the presidential nominee. Polls have shown Republican voters in South Carolina care most about defeating President Barack Obama, and Gingrich has always argued that he is the best suited to do so because he can take on Obama in the debates while running a campaign of inclusion that appeals to Americans of all backgrounds.

His exchange with Williams offered a potential preview of how effective Gingrich can be in taking on the liberal establishment, which will immediately bombard the eventual GOP nominee, in a way that can galvanize conservatives while being inclusive of and inspirational to all Americans.

Such moments can swing voter sentiment and turn elections around, and that is why Obama would probably fear Gingrich the most in a general election.

Gingrich was far from a one hit wonder on Monday.

When discussing terrorism, Gingrich eviscerated Ron Paul​ when Paul equated Osama Bin Laden to a Chinese dissident, calling that analogy “utterly irrational”

“A Chinese dissident who comes in here — a Chinese dissident who comes here seeking freedom is not the same as a terrorist who goes to Pakistan seeking asylum,” Gingrich said, noting that a 13-year-old named Andrew Jackson​ was sabred by a British officer during the Revolutionary War in South Carolina and wore that scare his whole life.

“Andrew Jackson had a pretty clear-cut idea about America’s enemies: Kill them,” Gingrich said to another round of raucous applause.

And when asked about No Child Left Behind, the Bush Administration law loathed by conservatives, Gingrich emphatically said it was “clearly a failure” because “ it has led teachers to be forced into a bureaucratic system of teaching to the test. I find virtually no teacher who likes it.”

Gingrich said that "first generation immigrants who don’t speak very good English are being tested against a national standard. And a perfectly good school looks bad even though it’s doing a great job because there’s no measurement that’s reasonable.”

Gingrich said he would say to the states that it would be good for them to “shrink their Departments of Education and return the power back to the local county boards, and then let parents and teachers and students get back to learning.”

There were four other debaters on the stage as well.

Rick Perry

Perry was relaxed and spoke about his record of creating jobs as governor of Texas. He called out the Obama administration’s “war against organized religion” and said South Carolina was at war against the federal government, especially when it came to the National Labor Relations Board​ trying to prevent Boeing from relocating to the right to work state of South Carolina.

When the Washington insiders were squabbling on stage, Perry casted himself as the anti-establishment outsider.

But again, Perry could not escape an “oops” moment that has plagued him throughout this cycle.

Perry said Turkey was “being ruled by, what many would perceive to be Islamic terrorists.” Perry should have explained this statement more to make clear voters knew he may have been referring to how Tukery has not been as reliable an ally as the United States hoped it would be during the last decade's war on terror. His inability to finesse such statements is what has led to voters having doubts about him as a national candidate and why this week may be his last week in the race.

Mitt Romney

Romney knew he would be attacked, and he had an uneven night.

When Perry said, “Mitt, we need you to release your income tax so people can see how you made your money” because “we can't fire our nominee in September,” Romney suggested that if he were the nominee that he would release his taxes in April but his answer was less than clear.

He did, as usual, show his considerable debating skills.

Asked about his flip-flopping, Romney said the main reason he is tagged as such is because of his past statements on abortion, and he explained how he is pro-life. He then turned the question around into a defense of American exceptionalism and how he is fighting for a merit-based society as opposed to Obama’s European-style “entitlement” society.

Asked about the steel companies that did not survive under Bain, Romney said it was hard to keep them in business because the Chinese flooded the market with cheap steal and deflected that criticism into an attack on unfair Chinese trade tactics.

Asked about campaign finance in the broader context of SuperPACs, Romney disavowed the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform legislation (McCain endorsed Romney just a week ago) and said he would prefer a system in which people can donate however much they want to their preferred candidate.

But again, he did not escape some awkward moments. When the subject of hunting came up, Romney awkwardly confused moose with elk and said he was not a great hunter before adding that he enjoys “the sport” and is “delighted to be able to go hunting” when he gets invited.

Santorum and Paul

Santorum had to fiercely attack Romney or Newt and ended up accomplishing neither. In fact, Santorum spent a lot of time picking fights with Paul. It is something he cannot resist. Likewise, Paul continued veering off his domestic message, which resonates with many primary voters, and could not resist emphasizing his foreign policy views that are anathema to many rank and file Republican voters, especially in South Carolina, with its strong military culture.

The next debate is Thursday in Charleston. And if Romney does not stumble, Gingrich will have to take votes away from Santorum, or vice versa,


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: backstabberromney; gingrich; gingrich4usa; loserromney; patriotgingrich; romney4romney; saboteurromney; speakergingrich; winnergingrich
Two things can be said about his constituency: either they're damned stupid bumpkins, or they're in denial. To choose the first would be to give them the benefit of the doubt. It would also argue against their being given the franchise. Instead of a poll tax, an IQ test prior to voting would be appropriate. Anyone who doesn't hit 100 or higher should be disqualified.
1 posted on 01/18/2012 5:18:58 AM PST by IbJensen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Williams is a great straight man. Newt landed the punch lines.


2 posted on 01/18/2012 5:28:06 AM PST by seton89 (Starve the Beast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: l8pilot; 2A Patriot; 2nd amendment mama; 4everontheRight; 77Jimmy; A Strict Constructionist; ...
South Carolina
Ping

Send FReepmail to join or leave this list.

3 posted on 01/18/2012 5:29:47 AM PST by upchuck (Let's have the Revolution NOW before we get dumbed down to the point that we can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seton89

The funny thing is that Juan Williams, the racist fool got caught in his own trap.


4 posted on 01/18/2012 5:31:51 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
Instead of a poll tax, an IQ test prior to voting would be appropriate. Anyone who doesn't hit 100 or higher should be disqualified.

Silly.

The IQ test would simply be re-defined in such a way as to give everyone who took it an IQ of 100 or greater. Legions of social scientists and educationists would step forward to declare the scientific and moral basis for such an action.

5 posted on 01/18/2012 5:33:14 AM PST by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

PLEASE MAKE YOUR FREE REPUBLIC
DONATION BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE!



Click the Pic


Support Free Republic

6 posted on 01/18/2012 5:44:24 AM PST by deoetdoctrinae (Gun-Free zones are playgrounds for felons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom; IbJensen

Something simpler, that the founders had in place.
Land/Property owners vote, others don’t.

Now, I know there are arguments about renters, veterans, etc. But getting the professional welfare class out of the voting booth is the goal.


7 posted on 01/18/2012 5:46:16 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Juan grew up in an entitlement/victimhood culture, went to school in a liberal environment, then went to work with a bunch of libs. To him, it’s how the world “IS”.

Pretty hard to fathom what it would be like (short of a born again conversion) to be slapped up the side of the head with the realization that the way you have seen the world since birth has been a total lie.


8 posted on 01/18/2012 5:48:26 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
At this point Santorum is only in the race so that he can get several cable news 'contributor' gigs on cable tv

Much the same way Herman Cain had from the beginning

We've just cast our early ballots for Newt here in Florida

.

9 posted on 01/18/2012 6:12:53 AM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

You just described the entire Black Community for the most part, and that truly should be a crime. Could you imagine growing up your entire life with everybody from your church to your government to your school and parents telling you that you are too stupid to do anything on your own and you need our help to survive, and then told that all your problems are caused by WHITE PEOPLE. Truly disgusting.


10 posted on 01/18/2012 6:20:20 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson