To: bushpilot1
Wow...inquire about the 1 at your own risk...
2 posted on
01/17/2012 4:02:16 PM PST by
chris37
(Heartless.)
To: chris37
The court chickened out. What you want to bet all courts in the state would chicken out. Nobody wants to own the hot potato of vetting the eligibility of a candidate.
5 posted on
01/17/2012 4:04:49 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
To: chris37
Well, isn’t THAT special!
To: chris37
Circuit Judge Helen Shores Lee As someone said before, this circuit judge is the biggest liberal on the bench where she is from.
To: chris37
Could be there are some existing federal laws regarding the use of bribes or cash inducements in regard to lawsuits focused on federal voting rights.
As soon as Holder's out of there someone should keep this one in mind for some prosecutions.
15 posted on
01/17/2012 4:22:27 PM PST by
muawiyah
To: chris37
All I can say is there is going to be a lot of counter suits filed if the lid ever blows off this pressure cooker. Orly can start with her $20,000 dollar sanctions fine she got in Georgia. I believe the Georgia judge was the one who said that twittering was an effective way to vet presidential candidates.
To: chris37
The Democrats drove Sarah Palin from office with endless suits. They all proved friviolous. No penalties were enacted against the Democrat plaintiffs. Now the show on the other foot works just opposit. At some point justice comes from the barrel of a gun.
To: chris37
But one of the lawyers said during a hearing today that party officials would not try to collect if Sorensen does not file any similar lawsuits during the 2012 election cycle.
“The Democratic Party has no desire to chase after a retired military man to collect,”
Unspoken:
“Unless of course he decides to buck the party again,
then we’ll take everything he has.”
25 posted on
01/17/2012 4:33:53 PM PST by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: bushpilot1; chris37; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; ...
I'll get you my pretty...
27 posted on
01/17/2012 4:40:15 PM PST by
null and void
(Day 1092 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
To: chris37
"Wow...inquire about the 1 at your own risk..." He didn't inquire. He sued.
29 posted on
01/17/2012 4:46:07 PM PST by
mlo
To: chris37
32 posted on
01/17/2012 4:56:55 PM PST by
yldstrk
( My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: chris37
Since they are Democrats, they should not mind being paid off in Confederate money.
43 posted on
01/17/2012 5:40:39 PM PST by
reg45
(I'm not angry that Lincoln freed the slaves. I'm angry that Franklin Roosevelt bought them back.)
To: chris37
This is a good decision for Alabama.
The judge has set the precedent for Loser Pays in all law suits.
This precedent means and end to frivolity in the courts.
62 posted on
01/18/2012 5:15:22 AM PST by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
