Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JLS
1. Newt, sat on the couch with Pelosi showing he has no principles, has been in DC too long thus adopts the language of the DC left like “swiftboating” and of course has never won outside a GA congressional district and then he reveals himself to be anti-capitalism in attacking Romney. Really it amounts to Newt having no firm core.

Trouble is a "firm core" for many conservatives seem to mean "firmly hating anyone with a D after their name." Newt showed that he could work with Bill Clinton for the good of the country as a whole without compromising his core principles. Obsessing over terms like "swiftboating" is totally asinine, especially since a reporter brought up that term to Newt, Newt didn't bring it up. The nitpicky stuff people like you pin on Newt is absolutely beyond the pale. Your goal is not to achieve conservative goals in the government, your goal is to nitpick people for being "less conservative" than you so you can feel smug and superior.

To say that Newt does not have core principles despite the massive power he had and the extremely conservative things he got passed is just ludicrous. Look at any Republicans in the Congress since the '90s and tell me that they stuck their neck out and went out on a limb for conservatives more than Newt did.

Calling Newt "anti-capitalism" is simply a strawman. He solely criticized Romney's use of government largesse and accounting tricks to make profits on the backs of other people, all of which has been explained in this thread. You need to explain why you believe Romney's business practices show the right kind of leadership we need in the White House. They are the equivalent of someone taking out a mortgage they can't afford and then expecting the government to bail them out and let them stay in their house.

96 posted on 01/15/2012 11:06:57 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: JediJones

BTW, you’ll appreciate these posts, which thoroughly address the “Newt supported Dede Scozzafava” crack, as well as the Nancy Pelosi couch.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2833086/posts?page=67#67
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2830232/posts?page=27#27


98 posted on 01/15/2012 11:13:16 PM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: JediJones

All the squabbling on this thread about who should drop out when you all know very well that at least as far as SC goes, no one will drop out (not counting Huntsman, who doesn’t count anyway). Now FL is i different subject. Depending on the results in SC, there is the possibility that the lowest man on the totem pole (probably Perry), might drop out. I doubt that Santorum or Gingrich would drop out however. We’ll know the answer in 6 more days.


104 posted on 01/16/2012 12:51:50 AM PST by flaglady47 (When the gov't fears the people, liberty; When the people fear the gov't, tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson