Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Antoninus

I agree, but I find it positively irrational that a plurality of REPUBLICANS would support a phony liberal as the standard bearer of the party. Other than a belief, reinforced by elitists, that “he can win”, what possible reason could anyone have for supporting him? He “understands business better that Obama”, perhaps? A soon to be arrested kid at a lemonade stand has that going for him as well. Bob


19 posted on 01/15/2012 9:59:12 PM PST by alstewartfan (27 of 36 of Romney's judicial appointments were DEMOCRATS!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: alstewartfan
I agree, but I find it positively irrational that a plurality of REPUBLICANS would support a phony liberal as the standard bearer of the party.

Our problem is the so-called "conservative" media who aren't conservatives at all. They just play them on TV (and radio). They have just enough influence to convince that portion of their audience that has no other source of news to vote for the worst possible candidate. This is why within the past 4 years, I have stopped listening to almost all of them.

The mask was slipping in 2008 and has really come off in this election cycle. We've got to figure out a way to use them to our advantage. At present, they are having their way with us. That MUST end.
22 posted on 01/15/2012 10:10:43 PM PST by Antoninus (Mitt Romney -- attempting to execute a hostile take-over of the Republican Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson