Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dr_lew

These tracks aren’t speculation. They are screen shots of the ship’s actual track from MarineTraffic.com. as reported by the ship’s AIS (Automatic Information System). The ship went through that narrow passage (for whatever reason), hit the rocks and then made for the port when the extent of the damage was realized. This required a 180° turn to the south, the ship’s final heading when it sank.


13 posted on 01/14/2012 11:03:52 PM PST by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: GATOR NAVY

I don’t believe it. You’re saying it acquired this great gash, then sojourned well past the harbor to the north, executed a 180, then got itself hung up on rocks remarkably similar to the ones that caused the gash earlier.

There has to be plenty of physical evidence, one way or the other. They did arrest him.


14 posted on 01/14/2012 11:10:53 PM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: GATOR NAVY
I'm confused. The Facebook posted tracks (red course line) is supposed to be correct, while the Marine Traffic charting of the ships navigational recorder data (blue course line) is incorrect?

Or did the ship not make her turn to the north as scheduled, and nearly ran into the island, then 'shot the slot' between those offshore rocks? That allegedly occurred in that long space between the last (blue track) position mark on the WNW heading, and the next off Punta del Lazzaretto, well to the NW of the port?

Where did those Facebook course postings come from, and how reliable are they?

16 posted on 01/14/2012 11:18:58 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (Pesting! Pesting! Pesting 1, 2, 3...; PESTING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson