You know SoL, this whole dump on Romney issue is ill-advised.
What’s the motive of running this negative stuff? Why it’s to damage the opponent. Is that what is taking place here?
Neither you or I are backing Romney. I wouldn’t vote for the guy. I’m not sure your stance on that.
The point is, this dirty laundry campaign has actually caused both you and I to do a double-take, and actually defend Romney. Frankly, that’s the last thing I want to be doing here, but I will not sit by and watch folks slam him for doing things that were legal, and things that were not as described.
Here you reveal how he wasn’t even part of the company when these things were done. Not only does it fail to harm Romney, and cause us to defend him when we don’t really want to, but it also destroys the people the adds are intended to benefit.
Talk about a fail, fail, fail...
I was watching MSNBC liberal the Chris Hayes show this morning and he pointed out something that I thought of just yesterday myself : The ‘King of Bain’s Romney came to Town’ video (I posted a link to for reference) the main source of the information being used for so many comments lately is strikingly similar to Michael Moore's ‘Capitalism a love Story’.
They both trot out the victims of greed and portray completely single sided narrative about the rich and powerful making money at the expense of the poor voter, taking their home in one movie, then taking their jobs in the other, Both movies are plagued with factual errors and intentional omissions.
I notice the Bain’ version victims tend to bring out the victims as poor Southern white hillbilly type personalities to target a certain viewer, where Moore likes to use lots of black and minority victims in his to target others.