Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Danny DeVito could be Romney’s best rebuttal to ‘King of Bain’ attacks
The American ^ | 1/12/12 | Josh Burek

Posted on 01/12/2012 1:55:15 PM PST by Nachum

Remember that big-budget Hollywood movie about the powerful company that creates jobs, drives innovation, and gives millions to charity? Neither do I.

From Gordon Gekko in “Wall Street” to Edward Lewis in “Pretty Woman,” Hollywood loves to hate corporate raiders. And now, we’ve learned, so do many of the Republican candidates for president not named Mitt Romney. “Winning our Future,” a super PAC that’s backing Newt Gingrich, just released a documentary called “When Mitt Romney Came to Town” that assails Romney’s record as head of Bain Capital. It’s the kind of withering attack on private equity that makes the Daily Kos crowd cheer.

Romney has tried to respond by noting how many net jobs—“well over 100,000”—he created. And he’s also empathized with those whose jobs were lost. “Any time a job is lost it’s a tragedy,” Romney said today. “For the family, for the individual that loses a job, it’s just devastating. And every time that we invested in the business it was to try and encourage that business to have ongoing life.”

The underlying issue for conservatives is not whether Romney qualifies as a millionaire job creator—a “unicorn,” to use Senator Harry Reid’s term of art. It is whether conservatives stand for free enterprise—period—or whether they stand only for the soft and cuddly kind of free enterprise that they and Washington regulators can manage.

This is crucial, because even liberals concede that free enterprise is a great engine of wealth creation. But liberals and conservatives alike often regard it as a necessary evil—immoral for sure, amoral at best.

(Excerpt) Read more at blog.american.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bain; devito; movies; otherpeoplesmoney; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
Vid at link
1 posted on 01/12/2012 1:55:18 PM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum
“Winning our Future,” a super PAC that’s backing Newt Gingrich

Ouch. Sounds like Obama's WTF

2 posted on 01/12/2012 2:02:35 PM PST by joe212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“It is whether conservatives stand for free enterprise—period—or whether they stand only for the soft and cuddly kind of free enterprise that they and Washington regulators can manage. “

Crony Captialist like Bain Captial and Mitt Romney wouldn’t know FREE ENTERPRISE even if it jumped up and bit them in the rear-end...!!


3 posted on 01/12/2012 2:03:18 PM PST by swampfox101 (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I care not for the rush to clarify and help Mitt. Dirty politics. Do conservatives stick up for that too? Mitt and his minions are masters of it. Who cares about that aspect? Who in the media has been scurrying to make it known? Now, folks are all worked up. Pfft.


4 posted on 01/12/2012 2:06:34 PM PST by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it's the new black. Mmm mmm mmm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
I was thinking about this movie on the way home from work.
It's a great speech on the life span of a business and or product.
Amen.
5 posted on 01/12/2012 2:07:16 PM PST by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Not good. If this keeps up all the Obamanation will have to do is produce a compilation of Republican attack ads/videos assailing Romney’s role at Bain. If it wasn’t before, characterizing him as an evil corporate raider is sure to be the Demorats’ prime objective if Romney is the GOP nominee.


6 posted on 01/12/2012 2:07:58 PM PST by luvbach1 (Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Also, I just heard that Kodak is about to go the way of the buggy whip due to changing technology.

7 posted on 01/12/2012 2:09:11 PM PST by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swampfox101

So if you dislike what Mitt and Bain did are you for laws to prevent it from occurring? What laws do you want?
Obama will be glad to listen


8 posted on 01/12/2012 2:09:11 PM PST by woofie (It takes three villages and a forest of woodland creatures to raise a child in Obamaville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: woofie
So if you dislike what Mitt and Bain did are you for laws to prevent it from occurring?

It's not about changing the laws, I just don't want the guy in the White House.

9 posted on 01/12/2012 2:10:52 PM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Free enterprise? LOL, that's not what this is about. This is about a company in trouble that is in trouble looking for help and ending up putting their arm in the mouth of a shark.

It's not Newt and Perry who are portraying corporations as evil, it's these people who think what Romney did to many of those companies is what capitalism is all about. We don't think corporations are bad or that businessmen are evil, but when they do evil thinggs we're not afraid to point it out. By slamming everyone who mentions that the Emperor has no clothes they are doing incredible damage to the reputations of good men and women who don't act like preditors.

10 posted on 01/12/2012 2:11:32 PM PST by McGavin999 ("If you'll have my back when I go to Washington, I'll have yours" Rick Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This article poses the critical question:

“The underlying issue ... is whether conservatives stand for free enterprise—period—or whether they stand only for the soft and cuddly kind of free enterprise that they and Washington regulators can manage.”


11 posted on 01/12/2012 2:13:27 PM PST by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Heres the point ...those people who want to change the law will use your dislike of Mitt to do it.... if its bad it should be illegal ..if it isnt bad there should be no complaining about doing it


12 posted on 01/12/2012 2:15:52 PM PST by woofie (It takes three villages and a forest of woodland creatures to raise a child in Obamaville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: joe212

Gingrich’s WTF came first. LOL.

http://www.amazon.com/Winning-Future-Century-Contract-America/dp/B005SN5LSA/ref=ntt_at_ep_dpt_12

;-)


13 posted on 01/12/2012 2:20:01 PM PST by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Why Danny DeVito could be Romney’s best rebuttal to ‘King of Bain’ attacks

You heard it here first.

(I'm so cutting edge.)

14 posted on 01/12/2012 2:22:42 PM PST by Maceman (Obama: As American as nasei goreng)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riverdawg
The problem with such questions, is that they're nothing but legally decontextualized platitudes which ignore the fact that government is already implicitly involved in the kinds of processes we're talking about re: Bain Capital—via how bankruptcy and corporate laws are structured and what not—which indirectly has major consequences on how winners and losers are getting decided. Which makes it vital to question how these laws are written, insofar as how they influence the rational behavior of agents in an ostensibly capitalist, free-market society. And ask yourself whether the laws provide the right kinds of accountability, etc. in order to mitigate moral hazard, encourage coherent economic decision-making with optimal time-preference valuation, and so forth.
15 posted on 01/12/2012 2:24:57 PM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ReneeLynn
Dirty politics. Do conservatives stick up for that too? Mitt and his minions are masters of it.

Then that is what Gingrich and Perry should be criticizing him for. Not his business.

And for those of you [not, you, Renee] who throw around the "crony" capitalist accusation, where's an example of it? I could understand criticizing him for that if he were.

But I have heard nothing about any special favors granted to Bain Capital by the government. "Crony capitalism" is on its way to becoming another meaningless term thrown around like "RINO" and "racist."

16 posted on 01/12/2012 2:27:34 PM PST by BfloGuy (The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry are just being “compassionate capitalists”. </sarcasm>


17 posted on 01/12/2012 2:38:09 PM PST by SuperSonic (When news breaks, we fix it! - FreeRepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woofie

“So if you dislike what Mitt and Bain did are you for laws to prevent it from occurring? What laws do you want?
Obama will be glad to listen”

Nice try....!!! Crony captialist like Bain Captial and Mitt Romney run around the halls of congress with money falling from their suitcases and you wanna ask me what can be done?

How bout some FREE ENTERPRISE, where cronies like Bain, Mitt, and others aren’t getting special favors from the government because they shove money down the pants of congress men and women.

As someone stated on these boards yesterday, how bout a little seperation of STATE and BUSINESS. No more corporate handouts, no more too big to fail, No more of captialist standing around waiting for a bailout by the American taxpayer.

To hell with captialist, let them make it or break it on their on, get out of the pocket of the Amerian taxpayer. That’s FREE ENTERPRISE.


18 posted on 01/12/2012 2:39:05 PM PST by swampfox101 (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

I guess the dollars they through at Congress is just window dressing huh?

Noooo...!! Bain and Mitt wouldn’t dare buy a vote or a favor would they? If you believe that, I got some beach front proptery on the Pacific Ocean down in TN. I wanna sell ya...!!


19 posted on 01/12/2012 2:44:01 PM PST by swampfox101 (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
If it wasn’t before, characterizing him as an evil corporate raider is sure to be the Demorats’ prime objective if Romney is the GOP nominee.

Obviously it was before, and will be in the Fall. Of course the Democrats will characterize Romney as an evil corporate raider - and it will work.

You know why it will work?

Because Romney WAS an evil corporate raider.

The Democrats won't need to paint him as one, all they will need to do is throw a cleansing bucket of water on him and the truth is there for all to see.

Isn't it better to see him as he is now, and not after it is too late?

20 posted on 01/12/2012 2:46:34 PM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson