Skip to comments.
GOP Santorum's chance at 9 Ohio delegates hampered
Associated Press ^
| 1/12/12
Posted on 01/12/2012 5:34:39 AM PST by Happy Valley Dude
Republican presidential hopeful Rick Santorum won't have a chance to vie for some of Ohio's national convention delegates.
The state's top election official said Wednesday that the former Pennsylvania senator won't appear on the ballot at the district level in three congressional districts in the battleground state. That means nine of Ohio's 66 delegates are off the table for him.
Ohio has a Republican primary system that requires people to vote twice. So while Santorum's name won't appear at the district level, voters could still choose to award him at-large delegates.
The party doles out 48 delegates from the March 6 primary based on how well candidates do in each of Ohio's 16 congressional districts. The other 18 delegates are awarded at large.
Besides Santorum, candidates Newt Gingrich, Jon Huntsman, Ron Paul, Rick Perry and Mitt Romney were certified for Ohio's ballot.
TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: ballotaccess; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
One of the jobs of the President is to manage the federal government. If a guy can't even organize a campaign, why would we believe that he can run the federal government? This isn't the first state that Santorum has screwed up in. His campaign has also messed up in VA, IL, TN, and DC.
To: Happy Valley Dude
In tennesse you can appoint delegates before or you can have them after, i think it is the same in ohio. So try and get it straight .
2
posted on
01/12/2012 5:39:01 AM PST
by
org.whodat
(What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
To: Happy Valley Dude
How could we have such a bunch of inept candidates at such a critical mass moment in our nations history?? Makes you wonder if it isn’t by design.
3
posted on
01/12/2012 5:39:04 AM PST
by
MachIV
To: Happy Valley Dude
RINOS are disgusting. They changed the rules in Va at the last minute—now this kind of BS.
It is NOT NECESSARY to have the Leftmost candidate possible in order to win—quite the contrary.
With RINORomney as candidate—the GOP will likely be finished and go down like the Whigs.
3rd party—anybody else??
4
posted on
01/12/2012 5:41:03 AM PST
by
Flintlock
(Photo ID for all voting. Let our dead rest in peace.)
To: MachIV
People cheat ~ and change the rules too late for others to respond.
We know who the cheaters are and who their acolytes are on FR my funny little friend with a Model Number for a name!
5
posted on
01/12/2012 5:52:48 AM PST
by
muawiyah
To: Happy Valley Dude
The Democrat party gets around the worst effects of these rules by MAKING SURE all their candidates get their 1 thousand or 10 thousand or 50 thousand signatures on nominating petitions, or that they've filled out the forms for delegate designation, or..... name the rule, the Democrat's very own Debbie Wasserman Schultz, or any of her predecessors, have done all these things.
Your boy Priebus IS NOT DOING THEM.
One of the purposes of the RNC is to make sure these apparent screw ups do not happen.
I think he needs to resign so we can replace him before more primaries happen. He is destroying the party.
6
posted on
01/12/2012 5:57:16 AM PST
by
muawiyah
To: MachIV
"Makes you wonder if it isnt by design."
This is one way the party controls the game.
7
posted on
01/12/2012 5:57:53 AM PST
by
Pietro
To: Flintlock
They changed the rules in Va at the last minutenow this kind of BS.
No last minute rule changes in OH, IL, TN, and DC. Is competency too much to ask from someone seeking the highest office in the land?
To: muawiyah
I have no “acolytes” on this forum. I’m a “lone wolf” here. Your comment seems to infer I’m involved in some conspiracy or something. Sorry if I misinterpreted, but I wasn’t sure how to take your comment.
9
posted on
01/12/2012 6:05:03 AM PST
by
MachIV
To: MachIV
10
posted on
01/12/2012 6:11:04 AM PST
by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah
One of the purposes of the RNC is to make sure these apparent screw ups do not happen.
I think he needs to resign so we can replace him before more primaries happen. He is destroying the party.
It's not the job of the RNC to ensure that each and every campaign is doing their job. Why was he the only campaign to screw up in Ohio?
Click the Love
Support Free Republic
Go Monthly
Sponsors will donate $10 for each new monthly sign-up
12
posted on
01/12/2012 6:36:24 AM PST
by
TheOldLady
(FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
To: Happy Valley Dude
Since the article you posted is short on facts, can you explain what Santorum did or didn’t do to cause this problem? And please don’t resort to insults and mud slinging.
13
posted on
01/12/2012 6:42:43 AM PST
by
Fresh Wind
('People have got to know whether or not their President is a crook.' Richard M. Nixon)
To: Happy Valley Dude
One more time, the DEMOCRATS don't have these screwups because their party works for them.
The failure is with the party leadership.
14
posted on
01/12/2012 6:51:21 AM PST
by
muawiyah
To: Fresh Wind
Since the article you posted is short on facts, can you explain what Santorum did or didnt do to cause this problem? And please dont resort to insults and mud slinging.
Each campaign is supposed to file slates of delegates and alternative delegates in each congressional district. Santorum's campaign failed to file slates of delegates and alternative delegates in three of Ohio's 16 congressional districts. If there is some kind of sinister conspiracy, it did not effect Gingrich, Romney, Paul, Perry, or Huntsman.
To: muawiyah
The failure is with the party leadership.Even worse, they don't even see it as a failure. It would seem that they have deliberately set the system up to favor well-funded establishment-approved candidates.
16
posted on
01/12/2012 6:58:47 AM PST
by
Fresh Wind
('People have got to know whether or not their President is a crook.' Richard M. Nixon)
To: Happy Valley Dude
17
posted on
01/12/2012 6:58:59 AM PST
by
org.whodat
(What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
To: Fresh Wind
They actually CAN’T see it as a failure ~ they are blinded by their own vision of class warfare ~ just as badly as the Leftwingtard ideologues who run San Francisco and Berkely.
18
posted on
01/12/2012 7:13:57 AM PST
by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah
To: Fresh Wind
Even worse, they don't even see it as a failure. It would seem that they have deliberately set the system up to favor well-funded establishment-approved candidates.
Because Ron Paul is such an "establishment-approved" candidate. If his crazy squad can meet the ballot requirements, why can't Santorum's campaign.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson