Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tsowellfan
If our side had consolidated into one candidate Romney would be in big trouble.

The problem is none of the alternatives really stand out against the others, they all have tremendous flaws, while they do have good points as well.

33 posted on 01/11/2012 8:15:40 PM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: dfwgator

“The problem is none of the alternatives really stand out against the others, they all have tremendous flaws, while they do have good points as well.”

-

The problem is Palin folded.

The worst part of it, is that Palin folded, it would seem, because ROMNEY’S SMEARS WORKED.

Why Palin would allow him this victory, eludes me.

I imagine I’m not alone, confounded about this.


35 posted on 01/11/2012 8:19:49 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (ROMNEY / ALINSKY 2012 (sarcasm))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator
they all have tremendous flaws

Compared to Romney and Obama those flaws aren't so tremendous to me. I'll take Newt's flaws or Santorum's flaws or Perry's flaws over Romney's anytime.

Romney's already starting to morph into his left of center candidacy before our eyes. He's getting ready to pander to the left.

That's Romney. He panders the conservatives until he knows he's got their vote. Then he panders the left. After he wins the election he panders the left much more than the conservatives. By re-election time he puts the conservative hat back on and blames his liberal actions on his inability to get things done because of the liberals in Congress. That's Romney in a nutshell.

38 posted on 01/11/2012 8:24:03 PM PST by tsowellfan (I dont need to read the papers. Rush & Mark do it for me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator
"The problem is none of the alternatives really stand out against the others

Which is why I think Paul is being very much underestimated. Newt can hurt Romney but I don't see him helping himself. Perry is done. Huntsman is done. That leaves Santorum or Paul as the anti Romney. Not sure how that plays out but I'd give the edge to Paul, since Paul has a national organization and has great appeal to independents.

Things are getting interesting, N.C. is going to be huge.

48 posted on 01/11/2012 8:29:36 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator; tsowellfan

” If our side had consolidated into one candidate Romney would be in big trouble. “<<<

” The problem is none of the alternatives really stand out against the others, they all have tremendous flaws, while they do have good points as well. “ <<<

What does it matter, really? The single message heard loud and clear is that 65% of the Republicans, at minimum, DO NOT WANT the Cram Down candidate. We have been rebelling and because of it we havre been sold a crock of idle threats that a two caucus states, with open primaries, and with enemies voting in the mix, seals the nomination and closes the nomination process? What a crock. Altogether, their are what, 13 lousy delegates? Laughable.

Rebel on!


49 posted on 01/11/2012 8:31:08 PM PST by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson