Skip to comments.
Sailors' farewell to families as new Royal Navy destroyer HMS Daring sets off on maiden deployment
The Daily Mail, UK ^
| 12th January 2012
Posted on 01/11/2012 7:10:05 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last

On its way: HMS Daring, the largest and most powerful destroyer warship ever built for the Royal Navy, leaves Portsmouth Harbour on its maiden voyage to the Middle East
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2085416/Royal-Navy-HMS-Daring-sets-seven-month-mission-Middle-East.html#ixzz1jD1lfwlg
To: sukhoi-30mki
I hope that history doesn’t repeat itself with what happened to the HMS Hood on her maiden voyage.
To: sukhoi-30mki
Fair Winds and Following Seas, HMS Daring.
3
posted on
01/11/2012 7:46:49 PM PST
by
NorCoGOP
(Obama's approval ratings: so low that Kenyans now accuse him of being born in the USA)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Best thing about the queens ships? They’re wet!
4
posted on
01/11/2012 7:49:54 PM PST
by
neodad
(USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
To: vetvetdoug
Which HMS Hood are you referring to?
To: sukhoi-30mki
I’m looking at the picture and asking myself..”Why does she have a tugboat mounted on her foredeck??
6
posted on
01/11/2012 8:18:58 PM PST
by
ken5050
(The ONLY reason to support Mitt: The Mormon Tabernacle Choir will appear at the WH each Christmas)
To: ken5050
Tug even brought its own bow wave to the foredeck:)
To: vetvetdoug
If you are referring to the Bismark engagement, Prince of wales was on her maiden voyage, Hood was a veteran - I think CS Forester called her a “fighting termagant”
8
posted on
01/11/2012 8:37:59 PM PST
by
redlegplanner
( No Representation without Taxation)
To: vetvetdoug
Hood was an older ship and veteran, I think, of Jutland in WWI. Pride of the British Navy but the girl was no virgin by the time of her fatal encounter with the Bismark. G*d bless all the men who went down with her.
9
posted on
01/11/2012 8:46:27 PM PST
by
katana
(Just my opinions)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Not to take away anything from The Royal Navy, but right now this is the best the Brits have. A destroyer. Man, how they have fallen.
10
posted on
01/11/2012 9:05:27 PM PST
by
jmacusa
(Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
To: katana
No, Hood missed WWI, commissioned in 1920.
11
posted on
01/11/2012 9:06:16 PM PST
by
GATOR NAVY
("The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen." -Dennis Prager)
To: katana
I had to look up the history as I remembered incorrectly that it was the Prince of Wales' maiden voyage, not HMS Hood. I also remembered that one of the survivors was a carpenter and refitting part of the ship when it went down so I incorrectly remembered it was unfinished. The HMS Hood was built in 1916. Thanks for steering me correct.
To: sukhoi-30mki
I understand exactly why this ship looks like she does. That being said, that is one fugly ship.
13
posted on
01/11/2012 9:09:18 PM PST
by
GATOR NAVY
("The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen." -Dennis Prager)
To: jmacusa
The term “Destroyer” these days has changed meaning. It’s much closer to a “Cruiser” than the small escort ships of yore. This thing carries a bunch of short and medium-range missiles, a torpedo-armed helicopter, and several medium guns, and a radar system that can track more than 400 targets simultaneously, and can easily tear most unfriendly navies a new a$$hole all on its own. Only Russia, the US, and Peru operate anything heavier that isn’t an aircraft carrier.
14
posted on
01/11/2012 9:22:22 PM PST
by
Little Pig
(Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
That looks to big a ship to be a destroyer
15
posted on
01/11/2012 9:43:10 PM PST
by
jpsb
To: jpsb
Yah... I was thinking cruiser, before reading the caption.
16
posted on
01/11/2012 9:48:06 PM PST
by
Ramius
(Personally, I'd give us one chance in three. More tea anyone?)
To: Ramius
Here is what a cruiser looks like these days

Ticonderoga class guided missile cruiser
The destroyer looks bigger.
17
posted on
01/11/2012 9:58:33 PM PST
by
jpsb
To: Little Pig
The South Korean King Sejong the Great class destroyer is bigger than a Type 45.
18
posted on
01/11/2012 10:07:04 PM PST
by
Dundee
(They gave up all their tomorrows for our today's.)
To: jpsb; Ramius
If you want to call it a cruiser, it’s pretty poorly armed. It’s not been fitted with anti-ship or land attack missiles and its torpedoes are meant for its helicopters.
I believe the USN’s Arleigh Burke and Japan’s Kongo class destroyers are comfortably bigger. And far more heavily armed.
To: Little Pig
Yeah but considering what the RN once was....
20
posted on
01/12/2012 3:59:19 AM PST
by
jmacusa
(Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson