Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: greeneyes
The way I understand it, you can’t single out one specific group (equal protection). So the law would have been ok, if they had not put in the extra step of naming sharia.

The brazenness and idiocy aside, you may be correct. Plus, to date, there have been no instances in OK which could have caused this suit. OK was correct, imho, but probably premature. They were asking the court to rule on a hypothetical.

We must remain on alert, however. The CAIR types are looking for a tent, under which they can slip their camel's nose....under the guise of political correctness, victimhood, religious persecution, blah, blah, blah.... They're exploiting the wonderful features of our constitution and using them against us and it pisses me off !

107 posted on 01/10/2012 5:07:54 PM PST by chiller ( Elect another batch of TPartiers and it won't matter which R we elect. WE will lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: chiller
Yes, I agree we need to keep alert. After studying the majority opinions, Oklahoma may just need to make a simple fix to the law to make it ok. I hope they continue this, cause if they don't(all the states need to also)then, Sharia will start sneaking in.
112 posted on 01/10/2012 5:19:32 PM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson