Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: babygene

This is a Federal election matter. A decision by a State Judge to disqualify Obama would immediately be kicked into a Federal Court, mot likely the USSC.


92 posted on 01/08/2012 5:24:54 PM PST by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: Enterprise

mot = most


94 posted on 01/08/2012 5:25:28 PM PST by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: Enterprise

Silly me, I thought it was the SOS job to certify/validate who gets put on a ballot. Do the Feds also design the presidential ballot?

However, I think we have found out that no one has been doing it for years and years.


97 posted on 01/08/2012 5:28:53 PM PST by Snoopers-868th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: Enterprise

That doesn’t match what Congress’ lawyers (The Congressional Research Service) said in their memos to the Congress-critters, explaining that the states are responsible for handling the election of their own Electors. The CRS told Congress to tell the people that it’s up to the states, so the people have gone to their own states and raised bloody heck.

It’s a little late for the feds to now claim that the job they kept telling us they couldn’t do is, in fact, only able to be done by them.

But then, that’s about par for judges who first say there is no case because Obama isn’t inaugurated yet, and then say there isn’t a case because Obama is already inaugurated...

The people are getting sick of this “say whatever you have to in order to tie the people’s hands and screw them right on top of a shredded Constitution”.


99 posted on 01/08/2012 5:29:47 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: Enterprise
The SCOTUS refused to hear the challenge to New Jersey letting Lautenberg take Torricelli's place, calling it a state matter. They did hear the Bush v Gore challenge in Florida because of the issue of equal protection of counting all the votes the same way.

In the Bush v Gore matter, the election had already occurred. In New Jersey, the election had not happened yet (although I can't recall if early voting had already started).

So I don't think is a foregone conclusion that it is a federal matter, and that the SCOTUS will intervene before an election occurs.

Furthermore, Article I Section 4 (Legislature elections) says:

"The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof;"

Article II Section I says (Executive elections):

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors...

So, there is plenty of evidence in the Constitution that federal elections were meant to be state-by-state matters. SCOTUS should tread lightly here.

-PJ

117 posted on 01/08/2012 5:47:05 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you can vote for President, then your children can run for President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: Enterprise

“This is a Federal election matter. A decision by a State Judge to disqualify Obama would immediately be kicked into a Federal Court, mot likely the USSC.”

I don’t believe that is true. Different states have different requirements to appear on the ballot. Look what’s happening in Virginia...


127 posted on 01/08/2012 6:01:21 PM PST by babygene (Figures don't lie, but liars can figure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson