Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Sorry to make everyone go to the link and watch the interview, but so far there is no transcript; however, this is a good interview about the race for the nomination. At the end she makes it pretty clear that she is joining, Rush, Levin and others in suggesting that Romney may be our weakest candidate. She clearly states the media and Obama believe that. If someone has the transcript, please post it.
1 posted on 01/07/2012 9:43:23 PM PST by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Lakeshark

Folks have been waiting for an endorsement from Sarah, but I think this anti-endorsement of Romney serves an even greater purpose. Mitt must NOT be the Republican nominee in 2012 (or any other year).

The man is a two-faced, statist liberal, pretending to be a conservative Republican, when his record precisely matches that of a liberal Democrat. He will bring down the entire right wing, if he’s elected, and possibly cause even greater damage than Obama has.

As usual, Sarah’s political instincts are right on the money. The administration is desperate to run against Romney, because he is one of the ONLY Republicans running that they can beat.


59 posted on 01/07/2012 11:09:41 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

Sarah is right. I’ve been saying this all along. Bain Capital is a deal breaker for him and the Mormon thing a total unknown factor. Can’t take a chance with Mitt. Besides, he is so smarmy and plastic-like a used car salesman trying to hawk snake oil.


62 posted on 01/07/2012 11:25:07 PM PST by Cincinna ( *** NOBAMA 2012 ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

Free Republic figured that our a year ago?

What they are just realizing this now?


81 posted on 01/08/2012 12:01:16 AM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

Wish I could vote for her. She wouldn’t mind standing up for the country if the good ole boys at Bush hq would had allowed her in.


83 posted on 01/08/2012 12:24:38 AM PST by Christie at the beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

Great interview of Palin.
Thanks for posting.


87 posted on 01/08/2012 12:43:51 AM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

During the after debate analysis, the Dem spokeswoman stated the dems wanted Mitt to win, because he is the weakest of the GOP wanabe’s. The others poo poo ‘d her for saying it out loud.
polls say Mitt is the favorite in SC, like its over with, but Saturday a straw poll by the Berkeley County GOP gives these results:
Santorum = 52%
Newt = 25%
Mitt = 13%
Don’t believe everything the LSM puts out.


90 posted on 01/08/2012 2:37:27 AM PST by bullfeather (sub pusher in sc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

Plan ‘A’ for not-Rotney to win the nomination for sure is for two of the not-Rotney’s to bow out. Plan ‘B’ is happening by default, because Plan ‘A’ is not materializing. Plan ‘B’ is for the electorate to perform the not-Rotney selection process for them. However, this is very inefficient and messy, and is being manipulated by Rotney and gang (including his super-PAC and Paul). Plan ‘B’ would get a nice boost, perhaps think of it as a Plan ‘S’, if Sarah could give an endorsement, say, on Monday - in time for word to echo throughout NH. Sarah’s problem is like trying to shoot the guys attacking your friend - she could shoot the wrong guy(s).


93 posted on 01/08/2012 3:47:51 AM PST by C210N (Dems: "We must tax you so that we can buy your votes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark
“I Believe The Mainstream Media And Obama Want To Face Mitt Romney In The General Election”

Donna Brasille basically said the same thing in the after-debate panel discussion last evening on ABC.


97 posted on 01/08/2012 4:59:06 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

Yep... Rush has said it from day one.

LLS


98 posted on 01/08/2012 5:02:06 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (obamao... ...the bastard son of a hippie slut and a drunk communist British Kenyan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark
She is joining, Rush, Levin and others in suggesting that Romney may be our weakest candidate. She clearly states the media and Obama believe that.

Palin was very clear about that and great to see all our guys getting that word out....the media certainly isn't hidding their hand by any means. Unfortunately the general public can be quite fickle so this fact of the media and Obama playing touch tag over our candidates needs to get out there....often!

100 posted on 01/08/2012 5:12:54 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

I heart Sarah.


102 posted on 01/08/2012 5:14:34 AM PST by Tribune7 (Vote Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

Lakeshark—thanks for posting this.

I missed this interview, instead watching that horrid “debate” last night.

Palin nailed it, and so did Donna Brazile(yecchh!)after the debate last night—Mitt is the one Obama, the Demons, and the LSM want to be our nominee.

Gingrich was the only one last night who sounded PResidential. Everyone else was crying in their beer.

And Romney gave his answers with that fake smile of his—you know, the one that the class brown-nose always wears when he gives the teacher the “right” answer.

We are facing the end of our Republic, and this is what the GOP hands us. Between Romney and Paul being putzes, Santorum getting lost in the weeds, and Perry wanting to go BACK into Iraq, and Huntsman speaking in Mandarin, it was clear that conservatives have one choice—Gingrich.

After seeing Palin again, I so want her to jump in. I would go to hell and back for her. Last time this was all decided by the first week of February(’08) giving us McStain.

I hold to the irrational hope that she will somehow jump in.

I have to hold on to something. Otherwise I’d be inconsolate.


110 posted on 01/08/2012 5:33:51 AM PST by exit82 (Democrats are the enemies of freedom. We have ideas-the Dems only have ideology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark
Photobucket
113 posted on 01/08/2012 6:05:35 AM PST by RetSignman (I take responsibility for what I post not for what you understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

Like Newt said
Obama will laugh his way to re-election against Romney


119 posted on 01/08/2012 6:26:02 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

As I posted earlier:

Romney is the MSM-selected republican candidate and they are working full-time to ensure he is the one on the ballot come November.

All candidates were ruthlessly attacked when they rose above Romney. They were attacked until they fell below him.

All.

Romney never suffered MSM attacks because the MSM wants to chose for us, and their choice is another McLame.

Mark my words, IF Romney is the nominee, then, and only then, will the MSM “investigate” him and they will attack him and his numbers will fall, fast.

The MSM will do exactly what they did with McLame. McLame was the MSM choice of the republican field and, oh how reasonable he was, a “maverick” willing to work both sides. . .then McLame got the republican nod and WHAM, the MSM turned on him like Cujo after tussling with a rabid raccoon.

The MSM will do this because they are what they are, rabid liberals and they will do what they have to spread the disease, and that disease is The Messiahs victory.

Mark my words, the MSM will leave Romney alone until we have no where else to go. Then, after the MSM goes “Cujo” on him, we will truly have no where else to go.

Why? Because when Cujo’s in the MSM attack they will infect the republican/conservative/independent voters.

Those infected voters will find themselves frothing at the mouth, angry at Romney and lamenting we have no one left that is willing to lead the republican/conservative cause.

Another victory for The Messiah. . .Cujo.


124 posted on 01/08/2012 7:26:28 AM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark
Sarah is of course correct. And how do we prevent the Romney nomination? I would suggest that it is within the power of Sarah and perhaps a few influential others (Sen. DeMint, Cain, Rush) to go all-in on an endorsement, before the South Carolina primary, for the one anti-Romney candidate who can beat Romney and 0 - Newt Gingrich.

Newt is a fighter and an inspiring leader who can rally the base to win in November. Neither Santorum or Perry comes close to Newt's combination of these essential qualities.

125 posted on 01/08/2012 7:33:27 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

She’s right. Romney is as electable as McCain and Dole. (Even Sarah couldn’t rescue McCain.)

When the libs say Romney is the most electable candidate, they’re playing briar-patch politics. Like Brer Rabbit begging not to be thrown into the briar patch because that was what he really wanted and he knew if he insisted hard enough Brer Fox would throw him in there, the Democrats are sayign they’re afraid of Romney so that Republicans will nominate him — precisely because they know that blur-the-differences Republicans don’t get elected.


148 posted on 01/08/2012 6:24:42 PM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

She’s right. Romney is as electable as McCain and Dole. (Even Sarah couldn’t rescue McCain.)

When the libs say Romney is the most electable candidate, they’re playing briar-patch politics. Like Brer Rabbit begging not to be thrown into the briar patch because that was what he really wanted and he knew if he insisted hard enough Brer Fox would throw him in there, the Democrats are saying they’re afraid of Romney so that Republicans will nominate him — precisely because they know that blur-the-differences Republicans don’t get elected.


149 posted on 01/08/2012 6:24:48 PM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

That would be one ringing anti-Willard endorsement from a very significant source.


157 posted on 01/08/2012 11:29:53 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

Palin is on the money again. Obama’s Occupy Wall Street and LSM are just waiting for Mitt to be the GOP nominee.


158 posted on 01/08/2012 11:36:26 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson