Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChuteTheMall

Mitt said nothing substantive the entire debate. Not sure how you can consider that “winning”, but okay.


1,277 posted on 01/07/2012 7:57:15 PM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1230 | View Replies ]


To: Utmost Certainty

Yet ABCs ANALysts are saying no one put a glove on Mitt, no one showed why he should not be the nominee.

I have to say I expected Newt to go after him a lot stronger. But maybe Newt has a strategery...


1,292 posted on 01/07/2012 7:58:53 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1277 | View Replies ]

To: Utmost Certainty
Mitt said nothing substantive the entire debate. Not sure how you can consider that “winning”, but okay.

He didn't have to -- somehow he knew there would not be a last opportunity for giving a two minute summary and made his right after Huntsman finished speaking Chinese. After the final commercial break, ABC came back and asked the stupid question about what each would be doing tonight if not at the debate. That was it, no opportunity for a closing by each. Romney got his in BEFORE the break and everyone else was shut out. I wonder if Mittens had some sort of a pager or something that vibrated when it was time to give a closing? Very strange.

1,372 posted on 01/07/2012 8:08:49 PM PST by CedarDave (I'm one of the 75 percenters: Nominate a conservative and not Romney as the GOP candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1277 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson