He already went there and took care of this for good by his unreported visit with eight out of nine blackest robed judges at SCOTUS on January 14, 2009, one week before his false inaoculation!
This visit tricled down to all the lower courts, State and municipalities!!
One of those eight has clearly said then: "We are evading this", hmmmm. Orly Taitz presented the facts to some State officials not long ago and they went to the backroom and came back and swept the whole thing under the rug!!!
Now Alabama have also put similar issue up for hearing???
I was referring to ‘going to SCOTUS’ as a legal procedure, not the traditional pre-Inaugural visit of the president-elect to the Justices, which is hardly secret. It’s part of Inaugural week every time a new POTUS is sworn in. And virtually nothing goes on inaugural week that’s not reported.
IF Obama were denied access to the ballot in GA on this judge’s interpretation of the Constitution, so far as I know, he’d have an automatic right to have a SCOTUS opinion rendered that would affirm or overturn the GA judge’s ruling. It might be the only thing that would force the Court finally to look at and interpret the ‘natural born’ language in the Constitution that they’ve been evading.