Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: danamco

I was referring to ‘going to SCOTUS’ as a legal procedure, not the traditional pre-Inaugural visit of the president-elect to the Justices, which is hardly secret. It’s part of Inaugural week every time a new POTUS is sworn in. And virtually nothing goes on inaugural week that’s not reported.

IF Obama were denied access to the ballot in GA on this judge’s interpretation of the Constitution, so far as I know, he’d have an automatic right to have a SCOTUS opinion rendered that would affirm or overturn the GA judge’s ruling. It might be the only thing that would force the Court finally to look at and interpret the ‘natural born’ language in the Constitution that they’ve been evading.


52 posted on 01/09/2012 8:10:51 AM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: EDINVA

Good luck with that!

The January 9, 209 meeting has not been reported, which was BEFORE the “inaguration” which BTW ALSO failed!!

Judge Thomas has clearly said what the nine black robed think...=...EVADING!!!


53 posted on 01/09/2012 8:16:48 AM PST by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson