Yeah..gotta be careful not to “marginalize Ron Paul and his supporters”..snicker.
LRon Paul Wants Kucinich in his Cabinet
Ron Paul booed during Tea Party debate after Osama bin Laden answer
I don’t understand why there isn’t an onslaught of negative ads airing 24/7 about this guy and his dangerous thinking. Better to take this guy out of the picture than Newt.
It's not about Ron Paul! It's about winning the votes of the Ron Paul followers that are strongly interested in limited government and adherence to the Constitution.
One has to think that this is the Democrat’s “Operation Chaos”. Iowa and New Hamshire are not relevant. Let’s see how this nut performs in real Primary’s.
Paul is an anti-semitic, libertine loon who happens to make a lot of sense on certain economic issues. I don’t know exactly what Palin means by “marginalize” but that’s the last group we need to pander to. They’re not that far removed in many respects from the nifty Occupy bunch.
LOL! Your kidding....right? :)
Ron Paul, Barney Frank Introduce Bill That Would End Pot Prohibition
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2011/06/23/137372951/ron-paul-barney-frank-to-introduce-bill-that-would-end-pot-prohibition
Also sponsors:The bill is co-sponsored by Reps. John Conyers (D-MI), Steve Cohen (D-TN), Jared Polis (D-CO), and Barbara Lee (D-CA).
Guess what the Feds did after they lifted alcohol prohibition. TAXED IT. Ron Paul needs all kinds of new taxes.
Ron Paul is three-fourths of a nut but some of his supporters may be redeemable to vote for a conservative once Paul fades.
I think that’s what she was saying. Concentrate on espousing the anti-government views of Ron Paul and attract as many of his supporters as you can.
That being said, when are Palin and Herman Cain gonna give it up?
Herman Cain has announced a 9-9-9 bus tour. How weird is that? And what’s in it for him?
His short-lived popularity as a candidate has certainly brought him fame and some fortune but, give it up, Herman.
I loved Palin but kinda feeling the same way about her now.
...but I know that our foreign policy at times has been inconsistent, self-serving and less than honorable (especially when a Dimocrat wins the Presidency!) Is it wrong to say that we have contributed to some of the problems in the world that we are now dealing with? FDR's administration was FULL of communists that subverted freedom around the world. We propped up dictators to keep countries from falling to communism at other times.
I don't agree with much of what Ron Paul says about foreign policy, but I agree that it is possible to pick fewer fights around the world and stir up less antagonism against us. We have to realistically deal with the legacy of the past hundred years or so, but we can begin by trying to ratchet down the involvement in other countries' affairs.
This douche Surber is a total Romney-bot.