Colebrook's Rappaport Again Tackles Obama's Right To Be President

NHPR ^ | Jan 4, 2012 | Chris Jensen

[SvenMagnussen]

Rep. Larry Rappaport (R - Colebrook) led a news conference Tuesday by a handful of legislators in Concord to explain their argument before the Ballot Law Commission that President Obama is not a U.S. Citizen and should not be on the ballot next November.

Here’s part of it as detailed in a legislative wrap-up story by NHPR’s Dan Gorenstein:

“I’m Representative Larry Rappaport, and today concerned New Hampshire State Representatives delivered a signed affidavit to state Attorney General Michael Delaney that we believe that Barack Obama was possibly not eligible to be President of the United States. This is not a birther issue. Our concern is only that he is a natural born citizen.”

The full NHPR story can be found here: http://www.nhpr.org/post/let-er-rip-nh-legislature-kicks-new-session.

[SvenMagnussen]

However, the inconsistency becomes obvious when the record shows that on November 15th. 2007 the Secretary of State’s office ruled that a Mr. Sal Mohamed was disqualified,and on July 19th. 2011 a Mr. Abdul K. Hassan Esq. was denied a place on the Presidential Ballot because they were not natural born citizens. Both letters were signed by Karen Ladd Assistant Secretary of State.

[ballplayer]

The final Outcome will be when Obama admits that The Kenyan was NOT his real Father,The Communist Frank Marshall Davis was

[TigersEye]

If 0bama's NBC status is good then why put out a blatantly phony BC?

Obama Birth Certificate Faked In Adobe Illustrator - Official Proof 1 ( Layers )

People don't create phony documents unless there is something wrong with the real ones or they don't have any at all.

[chrisnj]

Too late! soetoro/obama/soebarkah cannot claim a different father. Doing so would be admission of lies and fraud. He is stuck with BHO sr as his father!
After 4 yers and millions of dollars spent to affirm a Brit/Kenyan BHO sr father, then claim a different father? Get real!
If the liar usurper did not get thrown in jail for admitting fraudulent identity, see if he can run a pres campaign as a different person................

[chrisnj]

oops - 4 years not 4 yers

[ballplayer]

Problem there is he has Plausible Deniability, He Was TOLD WHO IS FATHER WAS,Who of us REALLY knows,we assume that what are Family tells us is so, but It is not 100 percent always that way. I am living Proof of that,I did not find out the true Identity of my real Father until I was in My thirties,I still have the Name of the Man who gave me His Name to Cover for My Mother who Had an Affair.My Children carry that name,what is the Point of changing?I am of a Different ethnic heritage than My Name Denotes and I now just ignore it. Dont Believe everything you see,there could always be something more you cant see

[skr]

Exactly.

[AlexW]

I have always been a “birther” in that there is obviously
SOMETHING that would be disqualifying, or at least very embarrassing about his birth location, father, or whatever.

The Mombasa birth claims may have been a plant by Obama’s puppet masters just to muddy the waters and make birthers look like kooks.
Who know what the true Obama story really is.
Has Kapiolani put up a monument yet?

Everything about Obumbo stinks from the day he was conceived.

[D Rider]

Everything about Obumbo stinks from the day he was conceived.

Do we have medical records to determine if he has jackels blood or not?

[IMR 4350]

Doesn't make any difference if he does. A court (divorce court) has determined Obama Sr. was his father at the time of his birth.

[ASA Vet]

The amazing thing is that the source is New Hampshire Public Radio (NHPR.)

[Mortrey]

Obviously, someone thinks there’s something to hide:

JUSTIA.COM SURGICALLY REMOVED “MINOR v HAPPERSETT” FROM 25 SUPREME COURT OPINIONS IN RUN UP TO ’08 ELECTION.

snip-”New evidence conclusively establishes that 25 U.S. Supreme Court opinions were sabotaged then republished at Justia.com during the run up to the ’08 election. My prior report documented the scrubbing of just two cases. But last week, a third sabotaged case was discovered which led to a thorough examination of all US Supreme Court cases which cite “Minor v. Happersett” as they appeared on Justia.com between 2006 and the present.

Since Justia placed affirmations on each tampered opinion which state “Full Text of Case”, personnel may also be guilty of violating 18 U.S.C. 1018 by intentionally passing off tampered versions of US Supreme Court opinions as if they were official versions published by the US Supreme Court.”

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/10/20/justia-com-surgically-removed-minor-v-happersett-from-25-supreme-court-opinions-in-run-up-to-08-election/

[Mimi3]

TigersEye, I went to your link and asked you (and anyone who could answer) in the previous thread. There was a comment there that I will cite below. Do you know how to refure it? Thanks in advance. "from my 13 years of experience as a digital artist. I think this certificate was printed with some sort of ink on a patterned paper. the ink faded as the time went by. The guy who enhanced this certificate separated the faded inked text with it's original layers. Then in began to darken the layer probably just adding contrast or just did a path around the black and filled it in with black. he was sloppy but you can obviously see in box 22. "date a aug" is an unnecessary layer. U lose."

[TigersEye]

At the link I provided he has three followup videos that answer questions and criticisms he received.

[SteveH]

http://www.nhpr.org/post/let-er-rip-nh-legislature-kicks-new-session

http://www.nhpr.org/post/colebrooks-rappaport-again-tackles-obamas-right-be-president

http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/293962/house-majority-leader-dresses-down-birther?CSAuthResp=1325688943%3Ahltbhj1og2hd5kbvordlklcpo5%3ACSUserId%7CCSGroupId%3Aapproved%3A4D3149A9AE9006EA6B07F8ABF1C2FA7F&CSUserId=94&CSGroupId=1