To: Spaulding; Irish Eyes; CatherineofAragon; wintertime; Iron Munro; alloysteel; Ordinary_American; ...
Consider this scenario: Donald Trump runs in a third party and aggressively raises the eligibility issue, and then as he is running pursues it in court. He would clearly have standing. He would clearly attract attention. Would any Republican have the integrity and cajones to raise the issue? What about the pistol packing guy from Texas?
19 posted on
01/02/2012 7:04:15 PM PST by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
To: AmericanVictory
I’ll see your scenario and raise you one.
Trump succeeds in having non-NBC candidates removed from the ballots.
Who’s left on the ballot?
20 posted on
01/02/2012 7:18:01 PM PST by
null and void
(Day 1077 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
To: AmericanVictory; Spaulding; Irish Eyes; CatherineofAragon; wintertime; Iron Munro; alloysteel; ...
The entire issue has been de-legitimized and inextricably attached to the "Birther" scenario.
It belongs in the courts. The Judges have all run from it.
The polite bar-room brawls (and not so polite) the endless references to the worthy von Puffendorf .... the iconic Vattel .... ain't worth a hill'o'beans until a court takes the case on the merits.
Our last chance is a state election board, a governor, an attorney general, someone somewhere who merely takes The Mombasa MF or whoever he is off the ballot, as is that official's Constitutional right and duty under the laws of his state.
That will put it in court where it belongs and we'll get to know if we are right ... or if we are all crazy.
24 posted on
01/02/2012 7:49:05 PM PST by
Kenny Bunk
((So, you're telling me Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts can't figure out this eligibility stuff?))
To: AmericanVictory
Consider this scenario: Donald Trump runs in a third party and aggressively raises the eligibility issue, and then as he is running pursues it in court. He would clearly have standing. He would clearly attract attention. Would any Republican have the integrity and cajones to raise the issue? What about the pistol packing guy from Texas? I don't believe anyone in the Republican party will raise the issue. It is considered gauche. (And yes I do believe that most Republicans are more concerned about social awkwardness than constitutional requirements.)
31 posted on
01/03/2012 7:20:21 AM PST by
DiogenesLamp
(Partus Sequitur Patrem)
To: AmericanVictory
And to follow up, I spend almost as much time arguing with wrong headed Republicans/conservatives as I do with Obots. As hard as it is to believe, there are conservatives that simply do not want to believe the truth.
32 posted on
01/03/2012 7:22:22 AM PST by
DiogenesLamp
(Partus Sequitur Patrem)
To: AmericanVictory
Trump has already raised the issue and dropped it. He does not need to run third party to raise it again. No, I don’t think that is his motivation.
34 posted on
01/03/2012 7:52:20 AM PST by
World'sGoneInsane
(We Can Take OUR Country Back--Perry 2012)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson