Click the Cute Chicks
Are You A Chick Magnet?
Become One by Donating to Free Republic
Become a New Monthly Donor Today
Posted on 01/02/2012 12:34:20 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper
INDEPENDENCE, Iowa — No more Mr. Nice Guy. Newt Gingrich will “draw a very clear contrast” with Romney “every day” immediately after the Iowa caucuses Tuesday, the former House speaker told ABC News.
“Everything we say will have Romney’s quote, Romney’s videotape, Romney’s record; it’ll all be based explicitly on Romney,” Gingrich said in an interview in Independence, Iowa.
Gingrich has said repeatedly that Republicans should aim their attacks at President Obama, not fellow Republicans. But after getting hammered by millions of dollars in negative ads, Gingrich says he will now return fire, targeting Romney over and over again.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
you opine: ““I will be the nominee.” LOL”
If you know primary history - you wouldn’t “LOL” - LOL
http://digitaljournal.com/article/317111
Right on!
Yes, the most important thing to ensure we get a great president is - have they maintained their marriage?
After all, look at the examples:
There's Carter, there's Clinton, there's Obama who all fit that criteria -
And then there's the last divorced president we had - who had also been a democrat! before switching -
That was Ronald Reagan.
Yep. Using your criteria is a winner...
AMEN
you say: “Gingrich will come off as the one person in the GOP who has actually accomplished something within our lifetime”
You mean like this?
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/12/14/newts_past_and_future_leadership_112396.html
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/07/gingrichs-unimpeachable-conservative-credential/
That’s just for a bit of information on NEWT - I don’t have a lot of faith in the general Sheeple, but it’s VERY discouraging at the level of uniformed Freepers - and thinking that their votes counts equally...
what a bunch of blathering hogwash -
might I ask that you reread what I posted? I DID NOT Say that Newt was going to go on the attack - but that he will BE ATTACKED as going back on his word not to attack -
That means that his opponents and the media will claim he is attacking -
I(f you read the rest of my post - you may understand what I said - That he will not HAVE to attack - just merely show video clips of Romney and let Romney’s own words sink him. That is not attacking. That’s just showing the truth.
Like this - one of the clips I included.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7OQoBxZZPqU
More like you learned nothing in the last 15 and refuse to now.
You are repeating what mitt and the GOP elite wants of you - wise up!
You speak of money when it comes to Newt - where is that same thing said of moneybags Mitt? No where - so blinded with rino spin you can’t see Mitt is using LOTS of money behind the scenes to backstab his way for the nomination and giving ‘favors’ to conservatives to back him. So much for ‘conservative values’. Your enemy isn’t Newt - it’s mitt - either you are attacking him or you already joined him.
You can support the Newt if you want a liberal nut as the GOP candidate. Obama will devastate him. Because he is in fact a puke.
At this point with the dwindling choices, its Santorum for me.
One thing for sure - you got nothing going on upstairs - thanks for the warning.
Sorry Bramps- didn’t see it, even though I spend too much time on this website....it’s great isn’t it. Happy New Year.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x91rBzNKvlci
Your personal insults are childish and do not improve the prospects or the qualifications of your zany troll, The Newt.
Not surprised with your liberal thin skin - it doesn’t take much to ‘feel insulted’. Grow up.
I think its your candidate that is the global warming, national health care boy. Are you retarded?
Brilliant minds think alike.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.