Skip to comments.
Another Horror Story about Government-Run Healthcare that Can’t Possibly Be True
Townhall.com ^
| January 1, 2011
| Daniel J. Mitchell
Posted on 01/01/2012 8:20:11 AM PST by Kaslin
Paul Krugman has told us that awful stories about government-run healthcare in Britain are false.
I guess this means that the media must be dominated by conservative liars, since we keep getting reports about substandard care and needless deaths (see here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here).
And the Boston Globe and Associated Press must be part of this vast right-wing conspiracy, because the Globe just ran an AP report exposing more problems in England. Here is an excerpt.
When David Evans needed a hernia operation, the 69-year-old farmer became so alarmed by the long wait that he used an ultrasound machine for pregnant sheep on himself, to make sure he wasnt getting worse. It was only after repeated calls from himself, his doctor and his local member of parliament that the hospital performed the surgery, nearly a year after it was first requested. Under government guidelines, he should have started getting treatment within 18 weeks. I was in quite a lot of pain, Evans said of his ordeal in Cornwall, southwest England. It really restricted what I could do around the farm since I couldnt lift anything heavy. Across Britain, an increasing number of patients like Evans are facing more pain and longer waits.
The deep flaws in the British system, by the way, do not imply that the American system is ideal. As Ive explained, the U.S. system also is heavily dominated by government, causing a massive third-party payer problem.
(h/t: Reason)
Ive written many times about politicians and bureaucrats screwing taxpayers with lavish compensation packages, but this story from Philadelphia is jaw dropping.
Councilwoman Marian B. Tasco is retiring Friday, but only so she can collect a $478,057 pension check and return to work Monday, when she will be sworn in for her seventh term. Tasco was one of six Council members to enroll in the citys controversial Deferred Retirement Option Plan, better known as DROP. She did not immediately return a request for comment.
When DROP was introduced during the Rendell administration, it was thought that it would cost little or nothing. But a study by the administration of Mayor Nutter said DROP had cost the city $258 million over 10 years.
Remember stories like this every time ones of these reprehensible politicians claim that spending has been cut to the bone and taxes have to be raised.
Dan Mitchell
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: healthcare; leftwinglunatic; obamacare; paulkrugman; socialism; socialisthealthcare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
To: the OlLine Rebel
Wow, I’ve never been to a Saks 5th Ave in my life!
Perhaps you are just the kind of person who DOESN’T get treated like a lesser person in these stores, because they don’t see you that way. Maybe it’s people like me. You never know.
Either way, I’ll shop at Walmart. You can keep the mall stores.
41
posted on
01/01/2012 12:24:40 PM PST
by
netmilsmom
(Happiness is a choice)
To: dr_lew
Fits Krugman all right (or is it alright? Hmmmm)
42
posted on
01/01/2012 12:31:48 PM PST
by
SkyDancer
("If You Want To Learn To Love Better, You Should Start With A Friend Who You Hate")
To: Kaslin
Paul Krugman must be on something. It is true you MARXIST MORON.Talk to people in Canada about their health care.
Paul why not move to Cuba or North Korea if you like government.
43
posted on
01/01/2012 3:41:15 PM PST
by
ExCTCitizen
(If we stay home in November '12, don't blame 0 for tearing up the CONSTITUTION!!)
To: ExCTCitizen
There are Canadians who like their healthcare. They simply don’t know any better. They’ve been lead to believe that a small life is part of social justice’s down payment on their souls.
44
posted on
01/01/2012 3:49:35 PM PST
by
Pan_Yans Wife
("Real solidarity means coming together for the common good."-Sarah Palin)
To: Kaslin
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-16337904
The BBC site runs many stories about what’s becoming a “two-tier” National Health Service (NHS). This means more privately paid-for care...(apparently anyone who can afford to do so is opting out of NHS).
Last week I read that those over 75 no longer get joint replacements and cataract surgeries unless they can pay themselves. We could argue all day about whether government SHOULD pay for health care; nevertheless dropping essential services to patients who have counted on NHS all their lives is rather nasty.
45
posted on
01/01/2012 4:50:30 PM PST
by
Veto!
(Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
To: ExCTCitizen
Been to Cuba. No one there likes their government unless they are party officials. Maybe 10% of the population.
46
posted on
01/01/2012 4:52:33 PM PST
by
Veto!
(Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
To: Kaslin
When everyone has health care, no one has it.
47
posted on
01/01/2012 7:11:45 PM PST
by
jyro
(French-like Democrats wave the white flag of surrender while we are winning)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson