Posted on 01/01/2012 5:35:11 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
January 1st, 2012
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): 2012 GOP presidential candidates Rick Perry, Ron Paul and Michele Bachmann.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): 2012 GOP presidential candidate Rick Santorum; Matt Strawn, Iowa GOP chairman.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky.
THIS WEEK (ABC): 2012 GOP presidential candidates Bachmann and Paul; Gov. Terry Branstad, R-Iowa.
STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Ron Paul; Branstad; Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa.
But he and Levin talk about the REAL conservatives in the race—Perry Bachman and Santorum as preferable because they don't have as "progressive" a record.
Of course, that is the Dem strategy, i.e., to focus on the Rep candidate and not on Obama and his record and policies Exactly, and I think that's what the rats want. It's one thing to have a candidate who has nothing at all to run on but its another to take his biggest screwup,obamacare, and neuter it as Romney would do.
THAT is absolutely, damn unfair .. to Equi africanus asinus,
which have FAR more honesty and integrity than David Gregory.
Currently, the MA state legislature is composed of the following: The House has 128 Democrats and 32 Republicans. The Senate has 36 Democrats, 4 Republicans.
Conservatives are being manipulated, by the push polls and by the trashing media.
I agree it's not a very good field. That said, the media and the polls push our candidates and then they trash them. Santorum, the new flavor of the month, will be found to be no better than the long list of candidates who preceded him. By that time the process will be complete. We will have three or four trashed candidates splitting the anti Mitt vote, and Mitt with his 30%, will take the nomination.
go out and sell some iced tea!!
The McCain/Palin ticket was up ++8 pts. days prior to September 18th, 2008.
So the RomneyTeam attacked Gov. Palin and her children to throw Election2008.
Romney for Obama in 2008
The Palmetto Scoop reported: "One of the first stories to hit the national airwaves was
the claim of a major internal strife between close McCain aides and the folks handling his running mate Sarah Palin."
"Im told by very good sources that this was indeed the case and that a rift had developed, but it was between Palins people and the staffers brought on from the failed presidential campaign of former Gov. Mitt Romney, not McCain aides."
"The sources said nearly 80 percent of Romneys former staff was absorbed by McCain and these individuals were responsible for what amounts to a premeditated, last-minute sabotage of Palin."
aides loyal to Romney inside the McCain campaign, said The Scoop, reportedly saw
that Palin would be a serious contender for the Republican nomination in 2012 or 2016, which made her a threat to another presidential quest by Romney.
"These staffers are now out trying to finish her off .hoping it would ingratiate themselves with Mitt Romney."
"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"
"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"
"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"
"Romney Supporters Trashing Palin"
"Romney advisors sniping at Palin?"
Some would say that being a participant earns you the right to criticize while being a spectator doesn’t.
Being in a campaign which has national implications I can tell you we have plenty of Tea Partiers who are willing to criticize but not actively do anything. They are big on meetings and short on actions. I find it very troubling.
Hiding behind the not the right candidate for me is just an excuse to stay out of the fight.
Happy New Year
If he is presenting damaging stuff about one of our candidates its primarily so it will lose its punch when the drivebys try it later.Then he can say "asked and answered" to their desperate moves to take our guy down while proping up the Kenyan.
Despite DG sputtering and interrupting, Rick really has BHO’s number on favoring jihadist Islamic foreign policy. RS knows this subject well. Of course, so does Newt who’s voiced the same opinion.
Great stuff here! If we just remember to ask are we better off and do we want 4 more years we win they lose. A few weeks ago it was tried on DNC Dave and he folded like a cheap suit.
If we just stick to basics as Rush has stated so many times and many seem to forget,any one of our candidates, weak, strong or whatever the DBM description,would make an infinitely better potus than who or what we have now!!
To forget that is to forget the basics of elections.
And same to you, Dear Lady snugs!
It’s GREAT to hear from you! How are you and yours?
“The Rush Limbaugh Show” 12/13/2011:
“This stuff with Newt and Romney going back and forth is not necessarily all bad because we're getting educated here. (interruption) No Snerdly, it's not all bad. We got BACHMAN, SANTORUM, PERRY out there. We got some GENUINE LEGITIMATE CONSERVATIVES out there!”
I didn't read any endorsements,did you?
;)
I believe as you do, that the choice is that stark. That’s why we MUST stop eating our own, coalesce and all VOTE - against BHO.
Wow. I don't know how you guys do it who watch all these Sunday shows on a regular basis. I want to vomit every time I watch one of these shows. David Gregory today, with Santorum, apparently forgot he was on television, because he was literally arguing his PERSONAL opinions with Santorum. It was pathetic. But I do give Santorum major credit for keeping his cool and not stooping to Gregory's level.
These hosts are out of control with their bias and opinions.
Snuglies, how your been; more importantly how has your bread pudding been?
Happy New Year
Well, he gushed for 3 weeks over Cain also and hasn’t mentioned him since.
I think Rush and I have something in common, anyone but zero!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.