You are one of the noobs that post on nothing but birther threads. You seem obsessed with the conspiracy...and heavily invested in keeping it going...for whatever reason.
Only someone wearing birther conspiracy goggles can't see that Serrano saying he's been trying unsuccessfully to get an answer for ten years means the justices have been evading it for ten years.
Who knows...Maybe I'll start pinging you to some other threads to get your opinions on the Iowa caucus, or Ron Paul, or Fast and Furious, or gay marriage, or Newt's 3rd wife, or Ed Rollins, or the Santorum surge, or Holder's assault on the new voter ID laws...y’know...the stuff that will actually matter come November?
When have they had an actual case to evade? How many times have they evaded taking an actual case on Presidential eligibility in the last 10 years, outside of the 2008 election?
Right. You know everything, such as what other people are thinking, which is why you automatically presumed what Clarence Thomas was or wasn't thinking. Are you trying to say you're open-minded?? If so, then you have to admit that your assumption about Thomas could be wrong. But there's not even a hint. And you're ignoring that I asked to see what the reaction was to Serrano's comments. You apparently would rather act like a drama queen.
You are one of the noobs that post on nothing but birther threads. You seem obsessed with the conspiracy...and heavily invested in keeping it going...for whatever reason.
I haven't said ANYTHING about a conspiracy. This is YOU trying to do my thinking for me ... AGAIN.
Only someone wearing birther conspiracy goggles can't see that Serrano saying he's been trying unsuccessfully to get an answer for ten years means the justices have been evading it for ten years.
If Serrano said they were evading it, then you might actually have a point, but he didn't. Since Thomas was actually the one who said it, then you need to show that it fits HIS pattern of comments.
Who knows...Maybe I'll start pinging you to some other threads to get your opinions on the Iowa caucus, or Ron Paul, or Fast and Furious, or gay marriage, or Newt's 3rd wife, or Ed Rollins, or the Santorum surge, or Holder's assault on the new voter ID laws...y’know...the stuff that will actually matter come November?
Right, so the Constitution doesn't matter. Are you sure you're not a Democrat?? You're acting like a jackass.